My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
08-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:28:31 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:23:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Annual Operation and i. ir.tenance: <br />Electricity (60 days of pumping) <br />Maintenance, inspection <br />Parts, etc. <br />Insurance, administration <br />TOTAL <br />$1,000 <br />$750 <br />$250 <br />$400 <br />S2,400/yr. <br />4.Timeline. The estimated timeline for design and construction of the project is as <br />follows: <br />Design (including securing easements) <br />Construction <br />3-4 months <br />2-4 months <br />Thus, the total time required from the date of authorization to proceed with design <br />by the District to completion of project construction is estimated at 5 - 8 months. <br />B.Recommended Cost-Sharing <br />The District has requested a recommendation regarding the most appropriate method of <br />funding the project among the various parties involved. Several options for allocating <br />costs for the project were considered. Each is described briefly below. <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Watershed area. All or a portion of the cost of the pmject could be assigned to <br />the three communities that share the lake based on the proportion of the total <br />watershed area that lies within each community. <br />Another option to allocate funding responsibility among the <br />fhreeo5esi?bS^ the proportionate volume of runoff each coii^unity <br />contributes to the lake for a standard runoff condition. The proportions are a <br />function of both the size of the watershed and the runoff characteristics of the land <br />use for the watershed within each community. <br />Assessed valuation. This option would base the funding responsibility for the <br />communities on the assessed value of the land within each city’s portion of the <br />watershed. <br />Watershed district funding. Under this scenario, the Minnehaha Creek <br />Watershed District would fund all or a portion of the project. <br />It is recommended that the equivalent runoff method be used to allocate the costs of the <br />project among residents of the Mooney Lake watershed w ithin the communities of <br />Plymouth, Medina, and Orono. This recommendation is based on the following factors: <br />Mooney Lake has no developed public access and is therefore not available <br />for use by the public at large. The direct benefits that result from the project <br />will affect the ripa.rian land owners only. <br />The primary cause of the higher water levels in Mooney Lake has been the <br />intensification of land use within the Mooney Lake watershed itself. Thus, the <br />owners of developed property within the watershed .'ire contributing to the <br />Mooney Lake Outlet <br />Feasibility Study
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.