My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
07-10-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 9:19:28 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 9:13:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
263
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
■■ <br />■ <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNE 19,2000 <br />Hawn recommended the parties meet prior to this application appearing before the City Council to <br />try to resolve these issues. <br />Smith stated in her view by allowing this application to go before the City Council as a failed motion, <br />♦ <br />the Planning Commission has not completed their job. <br />Lindquist stated in his opinion the unresolved issues that have c.sistcd for over a year need to be <br />resolved prior to this application proceeding on to the City Council. <br />#2592 MIKE HILBELINK AND JOHN VOGT, 350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH - <br />PROPO^D TWO LOT SUBDIVISION, 8:25 p.m. - 8:49 p.m. <br />Mike HilbelinNand John Vogt, Applicant:), were present. <br />The Certificate of Mal|mg and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Weinberger stated the Appn^^ts are proposing a lot split of an c.sisting parcel located at 350 Stubbs <br />Bay Road North. This property iNocated w ithin the RR-IB zoning district, with a two acre minimum. <br />this site is located on the cast side of Stubbs Bav Road, with the land to the w est of Stubbs Bay <br />road being located in the five acre minimum lot size district. <br />The Applicants arc proposing a front/back lot subdivision which requires greater zoning standards <br />for properties that do not have immediate road access. Lot 2 would not have direct access to a road. <br />This property docs have adequate land area to make this subdivision work, with both lots having <br />acreage that c.xcccds the required minimum standards. Weinberger stated one lot would consist of <br />approximately four acres, w ith the other lot consisting of approximately 10 acres. Weinberger stated <br />three acres arc required for a lot that docs not have direct access to a road. <br />Weinberger stated Lot 1 will be approximately 2.73 acres dr> buildabic. w ith the wetlands not <br />impacting upon the proposed building pads for either lot. The main issue with this application is the <br />access to the two properties, with front/back subdivisions requiring that an outlot be created as an <br />PAGE 21 <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.