Laserfiche WebLink
r-. <br />ir <br />h <br />i:'| <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, May 15, 2000 <br />understanding the Applicant will work with City Staff to revise his plans to bring it into conformance <br />with the Planning Commission's directives. <br />Smith indicated she would like to poll the Planning Commission members to see whether that <br />would be appropriate in this case. <br />The majority of the Planning Commission indicated they would be agreeable to making approval <br />contingent upon a reduction In the amount of hardcover and structural coverage proposed to what <br />currently exists on the property. <br />Stoddard Indicated he would not be In favor of making approval contingent and would prefer to see <br />the Applicant continue to work with City Staff prior to approval. <br />Lindquist indicated he would be willing to make a motion to allow 3.484 square feet In hardcover and <br />2,150 square feet In structural coverage, which is what exists now. <br />Nygard requested the Applicant limit the amount of structural coverage on this lot to 2,150 square <br />feel regardless of the location of the new residence. <br />Gaffron commented the Applicant Is looking at reducing approximately 51 square feel of hardcover. <br />Bottenberg stated an error was made In the calculation of hardcover and the amount existing is <br />3,384 square feel rather than 3,484 square feel. <br />Lindquist noted the amount of hardcover to be reduced would be 151 square feet rather than 51 <br />square feet. <br />Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2581, <br />John and Kristin Gehring, 1687 Concordia Street, with the understanding that the new <br />hardcover will not exceed the existing 3,384 square feet and that the structural coverage <br />will not exceed 2,150 square feet, and to grant a variance to the lakeshore setback to <br />permit the principal structure to be located 42 feet from the lakeshore. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Nygard moved, Stoddard seconded, to rescind the motion recommending denial of <br />Page 21