Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 <br />(#2549 David Lovelace, Continued) <br />Gaffron indicated he would be willing to work with the Big Island property owners on this matter and <br />to obtain the necessary information from the LMCD. <br />Stoddard moved, Smith seconded, to table Application #2549, David Lovelace, <br />220 Big Island, until April to allow the Big Island property owners time to resolve this <br />matter. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />(#10) #2547 KIMBERLI AND WILLIAM ABBOTT, 470 BIG ISLAND, AFTER-THE-FACT <br />VARIANCES, 11:29 p.m. -11:30 p.m. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted, <br />The Applicants were not present. <br />Stoddard moved, Kluth seconded, to table Application #2547, KImberli and Wiliam Abbott, <br />470 Big Island, due to the absence of the Applicants. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEW <br />(#12) MIKE HILBELINK/JOHN VOGT, 3850 WATERTOWN ROAD, CLASS III SUBDIVISION <br />Mike Hilbelink. Applicant, and John Vogt. Applicant, were present. <br />driveway for a property to serve a three lot development where a road would typically be required <br />for a three lot subdivision; two. variances to approve a subdivision resulting in a bam to be <br />located within a required side yard adjacent to street setback; three <br />and approved by City Staff; and four, approval of a subdivision with an outlet dedicated to a nding <br />ring in favor of proposed Lot 2. <br />Weinberger stated the property lies within the RR-1A zoning d^.rict. which has a acre ^ <br />Public Services Director has reviewed this lot layout and has recommended that Lot 3 not be granted <br />direct access to Watertown Road. <br />Weinberger stated some of these issues relating to road access can be resolved with City Staff^ <br />In addition, the bam. if developed with an access outlet or a pnvate road, would require a vanance <br />to remain on the property. The barn would be located on Lot 2 and would be Joceled enUrely <br />within the 100 feet side yard adjacent to street setback as proposed for an outloL Bams are <br />required to meet a minimum 75 foot setback to the lot line. Weinberger noted the bam encroaches <br />into the 75 foot required setback. <br />Weinberger stated the standard requirements would need to be complied with as they relate to <br />Page 25 <br />1 <br />4