My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2022
>
12-12-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2023 2:08:07 PM
Creation date
3/13/2023 2:02:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />November 28 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 6 of 8 <br /> <br />proficiently. The object of a fire district is to take the fire service off the plate of the individual cities and <br />combine it so the citizens and elected officials have oversight to speak on their behalf. Mr. Newcomer <br />noted it reduces the number of chiefs, officers, apparatus replacement committees, it reduces everything <br />and it runs more efficiently. When Mr. Newcomer moved to the area recently he looked into the fire <br />service and stated the men and women who serve are great people, dedicated, and professional. However, <br />they are about 30 years behind as the rest of the country is consolidating and getting down to business. <br />What is happening right now with Long Lake and Orono separating, it makes no sense and they are going <br />backwards. Instead of being 30 years behind they will be 35-40 years behind and in speaking with the <br />Mayor and Council, they agree that a fire district is important. He suggested they do it, they take this time <br />of contention, and move forward to look at a fire district. They do not need to hire a Fire Chief, buy a fire <br />truck and continue to pay those as it is doubling. He noted buying a fire truck when they already have the <br />resources in the area is wasting taxpayer money, time, and energy. He asked them to stop, for everyone to <br />have clear heads, and form what is the best for the community and people. He said “save money, save <br />time, save lives.” <br /> <br />Ann Turbeville, 997 Wildhurst Trail, continued what Mr. Turbeville was talking about earlier. She said <br />the Applicant stated for public benefit he was not asking for vacation of the strip of land attached to or <br />running along Wildhurst Trail although other properties along the street requested and were granted <br />vacation. This is misinterpreted and is not comparable to the vacation request. Prior to 1978 Wildhurst <br />Trail was reconstructed and widened and did not affect the properties at 1001 and 1000 Wildhurst Trail. <br />Conversely the City purchased land from 999, 997, and 995 Wildhurst Trail to widen the street, thus <br />leading to no easement at the street for these properties. One resident speaking in opposition suggested a <br />section with overhead power lines may be extended in the future to provide better coverage to this area. <br />First and most importantly, Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association did not receive a letter <br />from the City of Orono regarding this vacation request. The power lines on 1003 Wildhurst are provided <br />by Wright-Hennepin not Xcel Energy. Committee members and the City Planner dismissed this idea. <br />Conversation on this topic by the landowner and committee members made it sound like 1003 Wildhurst <br />Trail is the only property fed by these utilities and it would benefit to have the overhead lines buried. Six <br />homes on the north side of Wildhurst Trail receive power from those power lines, a resident pointed out <br />that Xcel Energy power fed from North Shore Drive is terrible power with consistent outages after <br />storms. It would be in the public interest to keep this option open to expand new utility services through <br />this right-of-way. The Applicant and a partner have a purchase agreement on the abutting 10 acres which <br />was dismissed as not relevant or a separate deal. Ms. Turbeville contends that this is extremely relevant. <br />The current power lines divide the plots, and if the right-of-way is vacated and the entire property is <br />joined it will set the table for a potential larger development in the future. The park and dense wooded <br />area are unlike any other in the City of Orono, it covers roughly 100 acres of continuous natural <br />hardwood habitat. While Ms. Turbeville is not looking to restrict a private landowner, she is asking the <br />Council to not use this vacation request as a step to develop the property in the next year or the next 50 <br />years. The Applicant’s entire property is 15 acres, enough to divide and build multiple houses. Not <br />vacating poses to no harm on the Applicant to do what he stated, such as have his parents live in the <br />existing cottage and build a house for himself, and possibly one for his son. Ms. Turbeville thanked the <br />Council for their time and consideration. <br /> <br />Barb Schmidt, 50 Landmark Drive, has questions about funds attached to the parks. She noted there is a <br />dedication fund and asked if there is a balance in that fund. <br /> <br />Mr. Edwards noted Ms. Schmidt can reach out to him with her questions, however he does not have that <br />information in front of him right now.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.