Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />November 28 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 8 <br /> <br />Crosby was sworn back into this office in Orono. Mr. Erickson wants to be clear this does not define him <br />and he did not have any part of this. He played a video on his laptop at the podium. <br /> <br />Dave Pearson, 2160 Weber Hills Road, noted he was on the Planning Commission and City Council in <br />Long Lake when they put the fire department together. He stated it was a heck of a fight but he thinks it <br />ended up properly. As a citizen, his concern is that the current City Council is on the road to spend <br />roughly $600,000 on a new fire truck and the hiring of a Fire Chief. The contract with the fire department <br />does not end until 2025 and Mr. Pearson noted they will be spending a lot of money to have their own fire <br />department. Mr. Pearson went to the open house where the Long Lake City Council gave a great <br />presentation regarding the costs and possible solutions to the standoff they have now. Mr. Pearson is here <br />to ask the City Council of Orono to host at least two town halls on the issue of why they need a fire <br />department and what the costs will be to the individual taxpayer. He thinks they owe it to the community <br />to have some say in the project. He stated they have been a community for over 100 years and in Orono <br />going their own direction regarding the fire department, Mr. Pearson worries about the community-aspect <br />with it all being about Orono. He asks the City Council to review the fire district process as it gives Long <br />Lake, Orono, and the surrounding towns a say in the fire department, both administratively and cost-wise. <br /> <br />Brian Turbeville, 997 Wildhurst Trail, spoke about the vacation request by Matt Johnson at 1003 <br />Wildhurst Trail. While there was furious opposition from the public at the Planning Commission meeting <br />on November 21, 2022, the system is not set up for questions-and-answers following the public comment. <br />He shared some points presented at the meeting: <br />1. The Applicant argued that the residents on Wildhurst Trail had previously requested and received <br />vacation on their property and this property had not been asked. Mr. Turbeville said this is a false <br />statement. The vacation has been requested at least two times prior, in 1978 and 2018, and were <br />both denied by the City. <br />2. The Applicant presented a similar road that ran directly through the house at 997 Wildhurst Trail <br />as a comparable circumstance to vacate the property. Mr. Turbeville stated the roads on the land <br />were vacated on Wildhurst Trail specifically to vacate houses. The Applicant is not requesting <br />development of a house so vacating at this time puts the cart before the horse. <br />3. The Applicant and committee extensively discussed precedence set with other recently vacated <br />properties. Referencing a letter from the Minnesota DNR dated November 14, 2022, they are <br />opposed as the vacation poses no public benefit or protects present or potential use of the land to <br />access public waterways. Those vacations also did not threaten overdevelopment. This one does <br />and should be reviewed on its own merit. Those properties did not abut to a park and should not <br />be used as precedence in this matter. <br />4. The Applicant and Planning Commission pointed out that the public currently does not have <br />access to the lake and would have to cross private property to get to the access point. Mr. <br />Turbeville noted an attached survey from 1978 which shows the actual point the channel was dug <br />out to and extends well into the City-owned right-of-way. <br />5. The Applicant stated for public benefit he was not asking for vacation of the strip of land attached <br />to or running along Wildhurst Trail, and that all other properties up the street had done so and <br />there is no easement there. Mr. Turbeville stated that is misleading; the property was purchased <br />from 999, 997, and 995 Wildhurst Trail to widen and construct Wildhurst Trail. <br /> <br />Todd Newcomer, 1070 Old Long Lake Road, would love to see a fire district formed in the area. He has <br />talked to individuals and groups and noted his background is as a firefighter paramedic for just under 30 <br />years, including as a Lieutenant in the fire service and an acting Battalion Chief. He noted it was a <br />combined fire district with 13 cities, 3 counties, covered close to 400 square miles, and it worked very