My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 4:25:09 PM
Creation date
3/9/2023 4:21:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Financial Issues <br />The current balance in the Park Dedication Fund is approximately $181,000. An itemized listing <br />of the revenues and expenditures in the Park Dedication Fund is also attached for your review. <br />The balance listed includes the costs for the purchase of the Larson Property in Navarre and the <br />costs for the land purchases and access installation for the Saga Hill Natural area. Also included <br />in the Park Fund Financial Report is revenues of $19,064 received from the Lake Minnetonka <br />Woods Town Home Development located in Navarre. This development will increase the number <br />of residents and the demand on park facilities in the Navarre area. 1999 Park Dedication Fund <br />revenues were approximately $161,000. <br />The estimated costs of $255,000 for the neighborhood concept plan exceed the $181,000 balance <br />in the Park Fund. The Park Commission has discussed Navarre Park at several meetings, and <br />revised the neighborhood concept plan to reduce the project costs. The decorative concrete <br />sidewalks were replaced with bituminous surfaced trails. The permanent picnic tables and benches <br />with concrete pads were eliminated, and will be replaced with less expensive portable picnic <br />tables. The decorative trash receptacles will be replaced with the standard trash barrels used in <br />the other parks. Purchasing of the plants for the planting beds was eliminated. The neighborhood <br />residents will be responsible for installing and maintaining the plantings. The lighting along the <br />sidewalks was also eliminated. The concept plan included reconfiguring several spaces in the <br />municipal parking lot to provide access from the street side for park users. This item was removed <br />to reduce costs. <br />Playground Equipment Potions <br />Earl F. Anderson Company developed two options for Landscape Structures play equipment. Plan <br />A was the same two module configuration that was used in Cottagewood Park. The two modules <br />were x^parate the older and younger children. The estimated cost for the purchase and <br />installaiioc A <bs> equipment is $52,000. An alternative Plan B single module was also developed. <br />The Park Commission reviewed both plans and preferred Plan A. City staff is in favor of Plan B <br />with the one larger module. This single module plan provides more activities on one module to <br />make play more interesting. It also includes more popular activities such as a track ride. The Park <br />commission was concerned that with one big module there may be conflicts between the older and <br />younger children. A review of the module shows a natural break where the younger children will <br />probably stay on one end the structure. The representative from Earl Anderson Company had <br />developed Plan B as a more cost effective solution that provides a greater variety of play activities <br />on one module. The estimated cost for the purchase and installation of this equipment is $41,000 <br />compared to $52,000 for Plan A. <br />We have reviewed the plans for other possible cost savings items. One item could be to substitute <br />pea gravel for the manufactured wood chip product. This would result in a savings of <br />approximately $3,000. It may be possible to save a greater amount by eliminating or reducing the <br />under drainage system. With pea gravel the under drainage system is less critical. The use of pea <br />gravel could also reduce future maintenance costs. <br />t
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.