My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 4:25:09 PM
Creation date
3/9/2023 4:21:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />5. <br />FINDINGS <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2553. <br />The property is located in the LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential <br />Zoning District. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 19, 2000 and <br />recommended approval on a vote of 4 to 0, ( 1 abstained). <br />4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A.The proposed sign is a two-sided cabinet sign that will be illuminated by <br />interior lighting and in total is approximately 40 s.f., being approximately <br />4' X 10' high placed on a metal base that is approximately 1' high. <br />B.The proposed sign is intended to advertise Good Shepherd Lutheran <br />Church. <br />C.Plaiming Commission accepts the appliczuit’s stated hardship that the 12 <br />s.f. limitation per sign surface would allow signage insufficient for the <br />existing church. There is no other signage currently on the property. <br />The location of the sign meets city standards. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demoi!Strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.