02-14-2000 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15,1999 A and Marilyn Fegers, Continued) Kluth inquire^wt^ther the shed still exists on the property. wn the shed down. •wtjgthe^ Fegers stated the wind n.' Stoddard stated with the acquisition^ on this application. idjoining piece of land, he would lend to look favorably Hawn moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approv3F«(^^plication #2545, Lou and Marilyn Fegers, 3590 North Shore Drive, granting of a hard^h^q^^riance to permit construction of an attached 24* by 30' garage to the west side oflTtei(^^idence subject to the Applicants submitting a revised survey, and further subject to rerfhMtal of the shed at the time of occupancy of the new structure. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#5) #2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - SUBDIVISION FOR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, 9:35 p.m. -10:30 p.m. The Certificate of ?<1ailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Charles Van Eeckhout, Applicant, was present. Weinberger slated the City of Orono has received a Preliminary Plat application for a seven lot residential development for property located at 120 Brown Road South. The Applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for a Planned Residential Development, which would allow the property to be developed at a two acre density using cluster development and preservation space. The RR-1B zoning district allows a property to be developed as a PRD as a conditional use. Under a PRD the City can establish setbacks for each of the lots. The Applicant is proposing four lots to be served on a private road, which would gain access from Tract G and ending in a cul-de-sac. The development would also include three larger lots. Lots 5. 6. and 7. This property is located immediately north of the Lucr Line Trail and south of the City of Long Lake. Weinberger stated the conditional use permit for the PRD would have the same consideration as the proposal by The Bancor Group regarding use of the land for higher density development with other land being dedicated for other purposes. This application would require a road width variance to allow the road to be developed at iCss than the minimum requirements. Tract G is platted 40 feet wide where the City requires a minimum platted width for a private residential road to be 50 feet. The Applicant is proposing a 24 foot road. The proposed road would serve as access for the property south of the road as well as potential access for the property to the north and the seven lots being proposed as part of this development, w^ich requires a road width of 28 feet. The subdivision is located within an area containing a number of wetlands as well as lying within the 100 floodplain. This subdivisior: would require a road crossing of a City protected wetland and located a NURP pond within 26 reet of the City protected wetland. The City Council and the MCWD will need to approve any v/etland alteration on si'.e. Weinberger noted the property is located outside of the MUSA area, however, this area is proposed to be serviced by City sewer in the future. It has been determined that this area would not be able to offer private septic due to the numoer of wetlands and high water table in the area. The DNR has expressed concerns with the proposed sevrer extension to the south end cf the project, with Page 16