My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-06-11 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road - (AKA: Co. Rd. 84)
>
3770 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-24-0121
>
Land Use
>
1990-06-11 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:21:07 PM
Creation date
2/27/2023 10:53:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3770
Street Name
Bayside
Street Type
Road
Address
3770 Bayside Rd
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
0511723240121
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1536 <br />June 11, 1990 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />A variance would similarly be required for ccr---�rsion of the <br />deck on the south side of the house to a screen porch, since <br />portions of that deck are less than 30' from rhe north lot <br />line. <br />Side street lot line setbacks would be required also under <br />the first 2 scenarios. If applicant acquired the entire <br />alley, his house would b•• at the 50' required setback from <br />Landmark Drive. <br />3. Hardcover within the existing property boundaries is within <br />the prescribed limits. However, much of the driveway and <br />existing garage are outside of applicant's property. The <br />most reasonable and consistent method for determining a <br />hardcover percent would be to presume that applicant will <br />gain half of the alley, and credit him for his existing <br />property, half of the alley, and the area of his <br />improvements that occur outside his property. This is shown <br />An Exhibit H. <br />Having spent more than an hour reviewing hardcover numbers <br />on this application, my estimation is that the proposed <br />additions per the architect's plan, fall within the letter <br />and intent of the hardcover ordinance under the assumptions <br />noted above. <br />III. Discussion - Septic System Concerns <br />The existing system is ex,remely substandard, even after <br />drairfield additions that were done in 1987. Those additions <br />were done on aninterim basis (see Exhibit I). There is one <br />relatively small septic tank, and approximately 400 square feet <br />of drainfield. Making reasonable assumptions about the Kilkenny <br />loam soils mapped in this area, one would expect a perc rate of <br />30-45 minutes per inch, requiring 300 s.f. of drainfield per <br />bedroom. The proposed 3 bedroom house should have 900 s.f. of <br />drainfield, but less than half of that exists. It is unlikely <br />that the existing system could be upgraded to serve a 3 bedroom <br />house within the setback and design requirements of the sepA c <br />code. <br />From Exhibit J, expansion area is very limited, even with <br />additional land from the alley. There would not be room <br />available to develop a mound system if soil conditions indicated <br />one was required. No testing has been submitted. Based on this, <br />staff would not recommend approval of expansion of this house to <br />3 bedrooms unless municipal sewer was available. A decision by <br />the City Council whether or not to seer this area is still <br />pending. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.