My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-06-11 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road - (AKA: Co. Rd. 84)
>
3770 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-24-0121
>
Land Use
>
1990-06-11 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:21:07 PM
Creation date
2/27/2023 10:53:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3770
Street Name
Bayside
Street Type
Road
Address
3770 Bayside Rd
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
0511723240121
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1536 <br />June 11, 1990 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />3. Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.12 requires that vacation <br />of an alley requires a petition by the majority of the land <br />owners abutting the property to be vacated. Technically, <br />there are four property owners abutting this alley, as can <br />be noted from the plat map. Therefore, technically, the <br />vacation cannot proceed until at least two more abutting <br />owners join in the petition. Technically, Mr. Burger at the <br />end of the alley would not gain any land, but the other <br />three owners would. <br />4. One of the concerns of vacating the alley is whether it will <br />limit access to other properties. Currently, all properties <br />abutting the alley have their main legal access at some <br />other location. The only property that could conceivably <br />benefit from this alley would be that of Hazel Anderson, <br />directly north of Gardiner, which does not abut a public or <br />private road, except that her property abuts Outlot C of <br />Bayside Landing, a driveway outlot to serve a new residence <br />north of the wetland. Also, Mrs. Anderson presumably has an <br />easement across John Burger's property along Gardiner's <br />north lot line, to use the driveway shared by Gardiner and <br />Anderson. If Mrs. Anderson has such an easement (this must <br />be verified), vacation of the alley would not deny her <br />access. <br />5. The Public works Director notes no problems with allowing <br />the vacation. <br />II. Variance Application - <br />1. Applicant is proposing to construct a second story addition <br />and eastward expansion of the existing house, in addition to <br />revising roof lines. This house is currently considered by <br />staff as a 2 bedroom house, and is proposed tj be converted <br />to 3 bedrooms. <br />2. Exhibits X, Y and 7. indicate the allowable building envelope <br />under 3 scenarios: <br />a) the existing property; <br />b) the existing propertl plus half of vacated alley; <br />c) existing property plus entire alley. <br />In each case, expansion of the house eastward requires a <br />setback variance to allow a north lot line setback of 4' <br />where 30' is required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.