My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
11-19-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:40 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:31:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER IS, 2001 <br />(#01-2724 MICHELLE AND DAVID TIMP, CONTINUED) <br />before it reaches the property line. Oberg stated the natural grade of the land flows to the west, which <br />will not be changed with constmction of the wall. <br />Gaffron stated the topography of the site shows the new grading directs the water runoff to the west <br />rather than straight down the lot, whicli siiuuld improve the situation. Gaffron noted there are two <br />areas where there will be some very minor grading within 73 feet of the lake to taper the land into the <br />wall at the very east and west ends. Gaffron inquired whether those cuts could be avoided, noting <br />they would technically require a variance. <br />Oberg staled the face of the wail lies behind the 7S-foot setback area, so the cut would be located <br />behind the 7S-foot setback as well. <br />Gaffron requested the grades within the 0-75’ setback area not be changed. <br />Oberg stated they put the stairway straight down to avoid any grading within that area. <br />Gaffron inquired if any steps have been taken to insure the global stability of the walls. <br />Hawn requested global stability be defined. <br />Oberg stated the walls are designed to support the amount of fill that is placed behind it. Oberg stated <br />the global stability comes into play if the whole slope would fall awa> f^rom the house and down the <br />hill, similar to a mudslide. Oberg stated he was unaware of that recommendation until today, but <br />would be agreeable to having ati engineer look at that aspect of the wall. Oberg noted the land is <br />virgin slope, w ith the chances of that slope being unstable relatively slim. <br />Hawn inquired whether there were any further public comments relating to this application. <br />There were no further public comments. <br />Mabusth inquired whether the drainage behind the wall has been addressed. <br />Oberg stated the wall has been designed with drain tile located behind it. Oberg stated the wall <br />consists of three-foot boulders with one foot of aggregate behind it. W ithin the aggregate is four-inch <br />drain tile with outlets every 40 feet out the face of the wall to handle the w ater runoff. Oberg stated <br />the only water that would run west would be surface water that would run across the top of the wall. <br />Mabusth inquired whether a two-tier type wall had been considered for this area. <br />Oberg noted there is only 12 feet from the house to the 75-foot setback, which does not allow <br />sufficient room for a two-tiered wall. <br />Stoddard noted the City generally likes to see some type of plantings to help screen the walls, and <br />inquired whether any type of creeping vine was considered. <br />Oberg stated due to the design of the wall, with the one foot of aggregate behind it, there no soil for <br />the vines to grow. <br />PAGE 19 <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.