Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER 15,200! <br />(#01-2723 MARK BREWER, CONTINUED) <br />Brewer indicated he has tried hard to comply with the City's regulations, and suggested that perhaps <br />the City work closer with people who do not have development experience sooner in the process. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Mabnsth moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #01-2723, Mark <br />Brewer, 3800 Shoreline Drive, Commercial Site Plan Review, based on the findings that it is <br />consistent with the B-5 zone, subject to all drainage issues being resolved for this site, with the <br />understanding the water runoff will drain to a future Hennepin County retention pond to the <br />northwest of this property ’, and further subject to the recommendations of the City Engineer <br />contained in his September 27,2001 and October 10,2001 reports. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#11) #01-2724 MICHELLE AND DAVID TIMP, 1000 WILDHURST TRAIL, <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 8:42 p.m.-9:12 p.m <br />David Timp, Applicant, and Tim Oberg, Southview Design, were present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicants arc requesting a variance and conditional use permit to permit <br />construction of a boulder retaining wall on the west and lake-side of the residence. The variance is <br />for average lakcshore setback and the conditional use permit is to permit grading of greater than 500 <br />cubic yards for the landscape work. The elevation of the land between the east and the west lot lines <br />varies by approximately 20 feet. The property owners wish to construct a boulder wall on the south <br />and west sides of the property to allow better use of the land. <br />Bottenberg stated the boulder w all starts on the back of the property and follows along the w est <br />property line for approximately 104 feet and is located 20 to 30 feet from the west property line. The <br />wall starts at grade level and gradually increases in height until the southwest comer where it is eight <br />fe't high. The remaining boulder wall is six feet in height. Bottenberg noted the boulder wall has <br />been designed and signed by a professional engineer. The City Engineer has reviewed the retaining <br />wall layout and feels the wall design is adequate. The City Engineer is recommending the global <br />slope stability of the wall be further investigated, particularly for worst case scenario. <br />The Applicant is also proposing to plant five 10-foot spruce and three 10 foot birch trees to screen the <br />boulder wall from lake view. <br />Timp stated he does not have anything to add to Staff s report. <br />Shawn McElhatton, Attomey-at-Law with Leonard, Street & Deinard, appeared on behalf of Ron <br />Zebeck, ^8 Wildhurst Trail. McElhatton stated his client has concerns relating to the stability of the <br />wall, the sight lines, and the drainage in the area. McElhatton stated he does not see any indication in <br />the Planner’s Report relating to how the drainage will be handled. <br />Oberg stated the trees are located on the bottom side of the wall, which will make them lower then <br />both of the adjoining residence.^. Oberg stated the drainage would not change since the wall ends <br />PAGE IS <br />#TM»n<.UL>4.J