My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
10-15-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:44 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:29:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment <br />of a substantial property right of the applicant. <br />h could be argued the preservation of the boathouse and existing house would preserve a <br />property amenity to continue use of two buildings.that are in good repair and add value to <br />the property. <br />II.The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, <br />comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contraiy' to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br />The buildings would not impair the health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect <br />be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely ser\ c as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />The existing condition and location ofthe buildings are the primary issues for not being able <br />to meet the setback requirements for structures. <br />Secondly, the existing location of the plumbing makes continued use of the existing house as <br />an acces.sory building with indoor plumbing fixtures. The buildings are legal non- <br />conforming structures that would not create further non-conformities, and reduce a non <br />conformity by eliminating fxirt of the existing house located within the Hennepin County <br />right of way. <br />Primary Issues for Discussion; <br />1.To clarify the position to allow accessory' buildings to remain on properties and whether to <br />deduct the hardcov er within 75 ’ of the lakeshore from the total allowed in 75-250' lakeshore <br />setback. <br />Is the boathouse of quality, historical value, and character to make findings there is a unique <br />situation that e.\ists on the property? And. is this a structure that meets the historic value and <br />character that would separate how the City views boathouses versus other accessory <br />structures that are found within 75' of the lakeshore? <br />Is the current location of the e.xisting house and location of plumbing fixtures within the <br />house a hardship that would be unique to this property and justify granting of the conditional <br />use permit and variances? <br />#01-2728 WiIHajh and Laura Stoddard <br />4365 North Shore Drive <br />lO/LVt)! <br />Page 5 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.