My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
07-16-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:25:59 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:24:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, Jnnc 18,2001____________ <br />:(Baywiad Christian Church, Conliaurd) <br />HavMi inquired uhal thoughts the Planning Commission had relating to standard number three <br />requiring that churches be located on a collector or arterial roadway as identified in the Orono <br />Comprehensive Plan or otherwise located so that access will be provided without conducting <br />significant tralTic onto hK'al residential streets. <br />Kluth inquired whether this condition also applies to churches in the 'R* District. <br />GafTron stated it diK's not. GafTron stated this is new language. <br />Stoddard stated in his view for consistency it should be omitted since it is not being required of other <br />churches in other areas. <br />Kluth stated the Council can regulate ingress and egress. <br />Ilawn staled the conditions the Planning Commission is reviewing are conditions that might be <br />involved with a conditional use permit. Ilawn stated in her view a church within a B-4 District is <br />difTcrent from a church ItKaled in a residential district where it is less likely to be located on a <br />collector or county road. <br />Kluth commented each application is unique in one way or another, and that the Council would have <br />the option of putting certain restrictions on the use. <br />Ilawn staled the Planning Commission is considering perfornunce standards for churches within the <br />B-4 District. <br />Ilawn inquired if there is a problem with hav ing the church have a separate rood ingress and egress <br />for what is ivpicallv a Sunday use. <br />Kluth stated it currently is not a standard in the ‘R* District. <br />Ilawn stated this standard would apply to churches only located in the B-t District. <br />Kluth staled he has concents about placing conditions on churches w ithin the B-4 District where those <br />conditions are not being applied to churches UKated in residential districts. <br />Hawn stated for churches that arc located in a residential district, they may only have residential <br />streets to access the church. Hawn stated in her opinion in general the people will he using the <br />collector street to access this particular site <br />Kluth slated he does not want to be looking at standards for one specific location hut rather at <br />standards that apply to the entire B-4 District. Kluth stated by placing a requirement relating to <br />arterial access may not work for all lots located within the B-4 District. <br />GafTron stated all the lots in the B-4 District have arterial access. <br />PAGE 12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.