My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
07-16-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:25:59 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:24:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />____________Moaday, Jmbc 18,2001____________ <br />(Baywiad Chrbtiaa Cburck, Coaliaacd) <br />HavMi inquired how ihe Planning Commission felt about standard number five requiring one parking <br />space be provided for each 2.5 seats of capacity in the main assembly hall or sanctuary, with <br />addit ional parking stan lards required per the sund4«id^ of the Zoning Chapter for other facilities such <br />as classnxims. licensed day care facilities or officci. Hawn noted the church is proposing a ratio of <br />one to four persons per car. <br />Hcckal slated in his conversations with other pastors in the area, they felt a ratio of one to four <br />persons per car was more reasonable for churches. Heckal stated he is unsure what Ihe reasoning is to <br />change the standard to 2.5. <br />Stoddard inquired what the B>4 standard is. <br />Hawn slated it varies depending on the use. <br />Kluth inquired whether there is this standard for churches located in the *R* District. <br />Gaffron staled the standard is 4 to I for churches no maner what district they are located in. GafTron <br />stated the City of Minnetonka utilizes a 2.5 ratio regardless of the district it is located in. Gaffron <br />stated the City diKS have specific parking standards for other uses. <br />Kluih staled if the Planning Commission docs make this a condition of approval and the church is <br />unable to meet the condition, they would cither need to apply for a variance or the conditional use <br />permit would be denied. Kluth staled the City Council has the discretion of making specific standards <br />under a conditional use permit regulating lighting, ingress and egress. ofT-street parking, berming. and <br />others. Kluth noted the current standard for other churches is 4 to I. Kluth recommended the <br />standard be kept at 4 to I, and to let the Council determine whether that is appropriate. <br />Hawn inquired whether this application was returned to the Planning Commission in order to give the <br />Council a recommendation on tiie parking issue. <br />Sanseverc stated the Council wanted the Planning Commission to have the opportunity to review this <br />application fully. Sansevere stated he would like the Planning Commission to look at churches in <br />general for the B-4 District and not just this specific church. <br />Hawn noted there current!' <br />being proposed. <br />'* a uniform standard regulating parking and that it depends on the use <br />Lindquist and Smith stated in their view they should stick with the current 4 to 1 standard. <br />Lindquist staled language could be added that the Council could change that requirement if it deems <br />appropriate. <br />Sansevere slated he will be looking at the requirements for the rest of the B-4 District. <br />Hawn staled currently there is not a parking standard for churches in the B-4 area and lliat tlie parking <br />standards vary depending on the use. <br />PAGE II
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.