My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
07-16-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:25:59 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:24:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />OKONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />____________Mondav. June 18, 2001 <br />(W01-268J Rick Benion, Coatinacd) <br />Denson stated the screen porch vsould remain as is. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Smith moved, Klulh seconded, to recummend approval of Application iV0l*2683, Kick Benson, <br />776 North Brow n Road, cranting of a variance for average lakeshore setback to allow a 70 foot <br />encroachment to replace the exbting decks on the lakeside of the residence. <br />VOTE; Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />(«J) NOl-2676 BAYWINI) CHRISTIAN CHI RCIl, B-4 AMENDMENT, PERFORMANCE <br />STANDARDS. 6:41 p.m. - 8:12 p.m. <br />George Wells. Ilelmer lleckal. Pastor. Greg Metz. Frank Svohoda, property owner, and Rodney <br />Deestrom appeared on behalf of the Bayvvind Christian Church. <br />Hie Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Gaffron stated the City Council reviewed this application at their June 11*^ meeting absent a formal <br />Planning Commission recommendation. On June 11*, the Council reconvened the public hearing <br />begun ut the Planning Commission, took public comments, and cloved the hearing. The Council <br />voted 5*0 to conceptually approve the addition of "Churches” as a Conditional Use in the B-4 Office <br />and Professional Business District, directing that the Planning Commission make a recommendation <br />regarding appropriate performance standards for that use. <br />Gaffron stated the conditional use pennit review provides .on opportunity to place conditions on the <br />use that w ill mitigate anticipated adverse impacts of the use, to protect the value of other property <br />w ithin the district, and to achieve the goals and objectives of the City ’s Comprehensive Plan. Denial <br />of a conditional use pennit for an allowed conditional use can only iKcur if it can be shown that the <br />proposed use does not comply with tfie standards required in tlie Zoning Code. A given conditional <br />use may b * deemed appropriate within a given zoning district only under specific conditions and <br />when certain standards arc met <br />Gaffron stated the general B-4 standards that are in place that apply to all B-4 uses include the <br />following; <br />Minimum lot size of 20.000 square feet <br />Minimum lot width of 100 feel <br />Minimum front yard of 20 feet <br />Minimum rear yard of 30 feel <br />Side driveway 12 feet minimum width for access to rear yard if no alley or side street access <br />Building setbacks: .IS feet front. 35 feet rear. 15 feet side. 35 feet side street. 35 feet from any lot <br />line abutting an ‘R’ District <br />Fence or compact evergreen hedge at least six feet high and at least 50 percent opaque required <br />along side or rear lot lines that abut on ‘R’ District <br />Maximum building height two and one-naif stories or 30 feet except as prov ided in Section 10.75 <br />i <br />PAGE 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.