Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, Ja»e IS, 2001____________ <br />ROLL <br />llie Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members resent: <br />Chair Eli/abcth Hawn. Commissioners William Stoddard, Dale Lindquist. Sandra Smith, <br />Janice Berg. Daniel Kluth. and Jeanne Ntabusth. The following represented City Staff: Planning <br />Director Michael Gaffron. Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg. aitd Recorder Jackie Young. <br />City Council Representative Dob Sansevere was present. <br />Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />PUBLIC IIEAKI.NGS <br />((H) M0I.26S2 TIMOTHY F. OLSON, 2510 OLD BEACH ROAD. CONDITIONAL USE <br />: ERMIT, 6:31 p.m. - 6:37 p.m. <br />Timothy Olson. Applicant, was present <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicants arc prop«ising to construct an accessory storage building <br />20’ by 24* behind their residence appro.ximatcly 50 feet from the side property line. A <br />conditional use peniiit is required bt^ause this lot is considered a “through” lot. By Zoning <br />Code definition, a “through'* lot is a lot which has a pair of opposite lot lines abutting two <br />substantially parallel streets and which is not a comer lot. On 3 through lot, K>lh street lines sht II be <br />front lines for applying the Zoning Chapter The lot abuts Mapleridge Lane and Old Peach Road. <br />Bonenbe.-g stated primary access to the residence is currently from Old Beach Road, w ith an <br />undeveloped access from Mapleridge Lone. The Applicants are not proposing a n* driveway. <br />Bottenberg noted the property is sewered, with sewer location not being an issue in this application. <br />Structural coverage and hardcover ore also not an issue with this proposal. <br />City Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit to construct an accessory building on <br />the property as proposed, meeting all required setbacks. <br />Olson stated he has nothing to add in addition to Staff s repim. noting he has brought pictures of the <br />property if the Planning Commission is interested in seeing them ) <br />Hawn inquired whether this should really be considered a througli lot since it is located on a <br />cul-de-sac off of Old Beach Road and d»KS not meet the typical definition of a through lot. <br />Gaffro.i staled this is not a typical through lot and that normally a through lot would liave two parallel <br />roads with a lot in between them. Gaffron stated if the Planning Commission .so desires. City Staff <br />could amend this section of the Zoning Cixlc to make lots similar to this property exempt from beiiig <br />a through lot. <br />PAGE I