06-18-2001 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Easements Tlic survey docs not show any existing easements along inlenor lot lines which w ill he moved. Any existing easements should be vacated along areas no longer serv ing as properly lines. Since this application is not a plau no new drainage/ulilii) casements are proposed nor requested, except that where such easements do exist along lot lines being moved, they should he rcdcdicated along the new K/t lines. Issues The vacant west parcel is a buitdable lot of record, assuming it meets the 200* width standard. W'idih is measured at the front 50* setback line. But where is the front lot line? The private curved drive surrounds the west lot on the north, south and west. The front, rear and side yards need to be established in order for setbacks to be applied to the lot. and to confirm where the lot width should be measured. The slope of the west lot defies strict interpretation of what is front/sidc/rcar ba.sed on the zoning code definition. I-rom a practical standpoint, the cast parcel and middle parcel a*sidences liave both been develop* ‘ with the residence oriented towards the lake. For these two prop«.rties the lake side is considered the front yard and to the north is the rear property line To be consistent with the yards of the other two properties, the yards for the vacant west parcel could be deluied as follows; • Front - lake side along driveway, beginning at tlie southern point of Uie reconfigured west parcel and extending northward along Uie curve totlic point where the driveway straightens out. • Rear- north as shown by surveyor. • Side yard- west side along driveway and along ea.st property line Jj.iceut to the middle parcel. It is questionable whether the we.<l side lot line adjacent to the d.iveway should be ^re^tcd as a ‘’side street." SialTrecommends tli.it it be simply a side lot line. If these setbacks are acceptable. »Fa: city accepts the yard .setback demarcation as showa by the surveyor on the survey. Only the cast parcel will have lake access. Staff Recommendation Staff is rec ommending approval of the lot line rearranuement as proposed on the survey , completed by Gn nberg & Associates. Inc. May 2j. 2t/iM ba.s-d on the following conditions: I. City accepts yard setback demarcation as shown b ' surveyor on survey and neither lot width nor setback variances will be needed to build on the west lot. 2. The applicant shall grant drainage and utility easements, to replace any such existing easements which will no longer follow lot lines. »OI-26SSK Woodhous* I “80 Shoreline Drne * Lot Line Rearrangement 6 14 01 Pages