06-18-2001 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Easements The suncy docs not show any existing easements along interior lot lines which will be moved. Any existing easements should be vacated along areas no longer serv ing as property lines. Since this application is not a plat, no new drainagc'ulility easements are proposed nor requested; except that where such casements do exist along lot lines being moved, they shi.uld be rededicated along the new lot lines. Issues The vacant west parcel is a buildable lot of’record, assuming it meets the 200* width standard. W idth is measured at the front 50* setback line But where is the front lot line? The private curved drive surrounds the west lot on the north, south and west. The front, rear and side yards need to be established in order for setbacks to be applied to the lot. and to confirm where the lot w idth should be measured, fhe slope of the w est lot defies strict interpretation of what is fronl'side/rear based on the zoning code definition. From a practical standpoint, the east parcel and middle parcel residences have both been develop^ ’ with the residence oriented towards the lake. For these two properties the lake side is considered the front yard and to the north is the rear property line. To be consistent with the yards of the other two properties, the yards lor the vacant west parcel could be defined a^ follows: • Front - lake side along driveway, beginning at the southern point of tiie reconiigurcd west parcel and extending northward along the curve tothe point where the driveway straightens out • Rear- north as shown by surveyor. • Side yard- west side along driveway and along ea.st property line adjacent u> the middle p;ircel. It is questionable whether the west side lot line adjacent to the d.ivev .e. .hould be ire .Med as a “side street.” Stall recommends that it be simply a side lot line. If these setbacks are acceptable. »'»c city accepts the yard setback demarcation as shown by the surveyor on the survey. Only the ea.vt parcel will have lake access. SlufT Recommendation Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rcamincemcnt as proposed on the survey, completed by Gronberg & Associates. Inc. May 2a. 2(<i'l based on the following conditions: 1 . City accepts yard setback demarcation as shown h;* surveyor on survey and neithci lot width nor setback variances will be nec*dcd to build on the west lot. 2. The applicant shall grant drainage and utility easements, to replace any such existing easements which will no longer follow lot lines. >t0l-268SK H'ooJholue I “SO Shoreline Drive , Lol Line Rearrangement 6 14 01 Pages J