Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />(HII-2676 <br />D-4 Amend neat: Churclics at a Conditional Um <br />Jane 14.2001 <br />PateJ <br />convents or homes for persons related to a religious function on the same site") and a specific <br />condition related to location ("provided that no building other than a residence shall be located <br />within 50 feet of any abutting lot line in an ‘R’ district"). Thea* arc no other specific standards for <br />a church in an R District, hence the general underlying ‘R’ District standards would apply in terms <br />of lot area, width, setbacks, hardcover in Shoreland area.s, etc. 1 he church would also be subject to <br />the general performance standards that apply to all uses and properties in the City. <br />Impacts on Adjacent Residential Uses . The impacts on an adjacent residential neighborhood created <br />by a church in the B*4 District arc probably no dilTerent than if the Church w as in on ‘R’ district. <br />Therefore, Ike same 50* strudurat setback for any building other than a residence, should appfy. <br />Since the City places no other restrictions on churches in *R* districts that pertain to impacts on <br />adjoining residential neighborhoods, it would perhaps be arbitraiy to create any new 'residential <br />impact* standards in the B-4 church use without also adding them to the *R* District church use <br />standards. However, the impacts of parking lots serving conditional uses in residential zones is not <br />dealt with adequately in the zoning code, and a greater setback should be required as will be <br />discussed below. <br />Impact on Adjacent Commercial Dses . In terms of protecting adjoining property values, the <br />Commission should consider whether adjacent commercially zoned property in the B-4 District will <br />be impacted as to value if a church is located on a B-4 site. Orono’s B-4 zone is very small, <br />comprising only 1 1 ta.x parcels and a total of about 17 acres. If the development of a church in the <br />middle of other developable parcels makes the comprehensive future development of a larger <br />combination of B-4 sites less fea.sible, some value might be lost, but this is only speculative. <br />There has been some concern raised by the Planning Commission that churches ore a use that tends <br />to grow and e.xpand. The commission may wish to consider whether or how such e.xponsion should <br />be limited. Will expansion of a single church use to multiple properties in B-4. or development of <br />more titan one church in B-4. be in conflict with City goals or tend to impact property values? <br />A somewhat related topic is the lack of tax revenue to pay for public services provided to property <br />used by tox-e.xempt organizations. The City has no ordinance requiring a Payment in '.ieu of Taxes <br />for such uses, although such uses ore provided with public serv ices. It may be appropriate to request <br />such a payment on an annual basis, but this should apply to all churches, not necessarily just those <br />in a B-4 zone. <br />In reviewing other conditional uses in the B-4 zone, few specific perfomiance standards are currently <br />in place. The "Nursing Homes, Hospitals" conditional use. which also includes rest homes or <br />retirement homes, requires 600 s.f. of lot area for each person intended to be accommodated, and <br />requires a 35' setback from the side lot line. There arc no specific standards listed for schools, <br />research centers. vctcrinar>’ clinics or kennels, libraries, museums or galleries in the B-4 zone. <br />Restaurants are limited to those w iihin and mainly serving on office building (i.e. an office cafeteria) <br />and there con be no outside display or advertising of the restaurant use. ^