Laserfiche WebLink
Sidewalks <br />In order to reduce hardcover to meet the 25% limit, no front sidcvvalk is proposed between the front <br />entry and the driveway. Stall feels this is unreasonable given Uial I) there are front steps leading to <br />the lawn, and 2) this or a future homcowticr may add a sidewalk a: a later date, exceeding hardcover <br />limits. <br />Land Area <75-250*1 setback <br />13.182.8 s.f. <br />2SV« of Land Area <br />3,296 s.f. (Total hardcover allowed on property) <br />Proposed Hardcover <br />0-75' setback <br />75-250' setback <br />Total Hardcover Allowed <br />* Variance = <br />96 s.f. <br />3.2S0 s.f. <br />3.346 s.f. (Total hardcover proposed) <br />3 J96 s.f. <br />(50 a.f.l The proposed site plan, including the ice house <br />w ould be 50 s.f. over the total hardcover permitted <br />on the property'. City policy is any hardcover <br />within 75* of the lake (during new construction) is <br />deducted from the amount allowed in the 75-250* <br />setback. <br />Additional Hardcover for future driveway and sidewalk = 150 s.f Total hardcover would be (26.5^'i) <br />including the following hardcover: <br />% s.f ice house <br />3,250 s.f house, garage and driveway <br />150 s.f additional sidewalk and drivcvsay for third stall of garage <br />3,496 s.f Total hardcover <br />Issues for Dbciission: <br />1.Should the structure be permitted, by \ ariance, to remain on the property? The lee house was <br />required to be removed from the property when the principal building was removed. <br />The proposed site plan for new home construction requires greater than the allowed 3.296 <br />s.f Keeping the ice house would require an additional 50 s.f of hardcover. <br />Should the foundation be permitted to be replaced/repaired extending the useful life of the <br />structure? <br />Should the City accept the plan without additional plans to provide additional hardcover for <br />a larger driveway and sidewalk? <br />•2636 C«> mJ Smm Cabk <br />3532 Ivy PUKt <br />P^2 <br />ll