03-19-2001 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

y*giiincnt Code Sections 1.Seclion 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Scclion 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) (2): To permit an alteration to c.xisting hardcover over the allowed 25%. I.ot Area 75-250’ 12,727 s.f. ____ Allowed Hardcover 3,181 s.f. (25%)^X’ n ^4-^ HxistingHardcover 3,710s.f.(29%) o^r ^ ^ A Proposed Hardcover 4,902 s.f. (38%) IS t C^vMy.') IP Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C): To permit greater than 15% lot coverage by structures. Lot Area Allowed Coverage Existing Coverage Proposed Coverage 17,467 s.f. (15%)P 2,620 s.f. (17%) O 2,970 s.f. (18.5%) 3.237 s.f. 267 s.f. increase in lot coverage Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (D); To permit an encroachment into the side setback 2.85' from the side proper!) line for construction of a 30' X 30’ attached g.irage, where a 10’ side setback is required and to permit the garage addition 21.76’ from the front property line where a 30’ setback is required. Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (13): To pemiit an encroachment into the side setback 2.64’ from the side property line to pemtit the addition of a second .stor>- above the existing residence within the required 10’ side setback. hequired Scthacks,L,RJ_C Front Yard » 30’ Side Yard » 10’ Discussion: Applicants luivc addressed the issue of egress and ingress to the property with the existing garage location. 1 he existing garage is located only 18' from Casco Point Road and faces the road creating a potentially hazardous situation with vehicles backing out to the road without the ability to view on coming vehicles and pedestrians. Several obstacles including a neighboring fence, tree and telephone pole block much of the view to the street. I'he attached garage allows the vehicles to back out into the yard and approach the street at an angle improving views to the suect as well as allowing vehicles traveling on Casco Point Road to more easily view entering vcliiclcs from the applicant’s property. In the applicant’s letter of request Uiey liave stated there have been dozens of broke screeching near misses while backing out. The concern is the location of the proposed attached garage that w ould be located only 2.85’ from the side lot line w here a 10’ setback is required. Con."'*: action of the house w as before the adoption of the current zoning standards. The site plan shows the location of the house in relation to the property line. The garage would not encroach any closer to the side property line than the house. f 2frt4 Gif> and Joan Starquardl 2617 Caico Pomi Road VwiwMt - PitbU Hcafiag Pa|< 2 of 5