My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-21-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
02-21-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:24:02 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:23:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Section 10.56. Subdivision 16 (C) (6) and Section 10.22, Subdivision I (B): To permit an <br />encroachment into the average lakeshore setback on the north side of the house to construct <br />a new fence exceeding 3 '/j feet in height. A six foot fence/wall system is proposed. <br />Required Setbacks LR-IC <br />Front Yard = 30' <br />Side Yard= 10* <br />Issues: <br />I. CoBfonnit\’ to Zoning Code aad CoMPrehensivc Plf <br />The applicants have proposed to reduce the total hardcover on the property by removing part of the <br />driveway tlial is not required for maneuvering vehicles, mostly to the east side of the proposed <br />garage. Ilje building additions have been placed mostly over areas that contain hardcover. <br />The replacement of the deck and the dog kennel located to the back of the house would encroach into <br />the average lakeshore setback to the north side of the propcrt>\ The average lakeshore setback <br />ordinance is intended to protect lakeshore views for adjacent properties. Staff visited the site and <br />determined this property as well as the other properties nearby have lakeshore access across North <br />Shore Drive on the south sides of the properties. <br />The DNR has determined the 929.4 ’ cle\*ation is the high water level of Lake Minnetonka. The <br />929.4' elevation docs reach the applicant’s property and adjacent properties. A visual inspection of <br />the site has determined there is no real lake access or water to the rear of this property. It functions <br />ns a wetland leading to Lake Minnetonka. The north sides of the properties function as back yards <br />and have been developed accordingly. The primary lake views and docks arc located to the North <br />Shore Drive side of the property. Please review the attached topographic map and air photo dial <br />indicate the approximate water's edge of Lake Minnetonka. <br />A 2 ’ high railroad lie retaining wall that is located along the side of the driveway. The ties arc <br />necessary to stabilize the ground between the driveway and the elevation of an adjacent house. The <br />neighboring lot is 2' higher at the property line. Replacement of a the wall is necessary for <br />maintenance purposes. A variance is only required because the wall constitutes hardcover. <br />Review of Hardship: <br />1. The primary factor that support^ some degree of hardcover tmiance is that the 75-250 ’ zone <br />is reduced in size by hrt\lng lake on both ends of the lot. Additional hardcover may be <br />required to acconwnodate a turn around on site to eliminate vehicles from backing out to <br />North Sliore Drive. This is a change to the existing site plan that has a side loading garage <br />that allows vehicles to maneuver before entering North Shore Drive. <br />2. The average lakeshore setback ordinance is intended to protect lakeshore views for adjacent <br />properties. Lake access is generally to the south across North Shore Drive. Access to the <br />lake is not possible due to the actual lakeshore being located further to the west. The north <br />•0I-2MI Tliomai Ingna Andcnon <br />)550NonhSlMMeI>m« <br />Vananert <br />Pv2of4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.