My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-21-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
02-21-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:24:02 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:23:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TIIE ORO.NO PLANMNG COMMISSION <br />Wcdncsciny, Jnriiinry 17, 20<)l <br />(02550 Charles Van Eeckhout, Continucii) <br />Van Eeckhout stated he would like to get some guidance from the Pbnning Commission on his <br />plan and that he is simpl> following the required procedure. <br />Kluth stated the Planning Commission has given the Applicant guidance on having smaller <br />lot sizes and the need to resolve the access issue Kluib stated until the access issue is resolved, <br />the Planning Commission is really unable to gi\c a recommendation one way or another on the <br />proposal <br />Van Peckhoui stated he docs have legal access off of Apple Glen Road but he is attempting to <br />pro\. Jc access off of Brown Road due to the concerns expressed by the residents of Long Lake. <br />Berg stated once access has been resolved, she would be willing to review the plan, but at this <br />point in time, she cannot approve any plan without knowing how the development will be <br />accessed <br />Bellows commented in her view this cannot be considered n proper public hearing since the <br />Plaiuiing Commission was not supplied with the proper documentation on the plan being discussed <br />by the Applicant tonight <br />Van Eeckhout reiterated he u mcrelv lookmg for some guidance from the Planning Commission at <br />this point <br />Bellows stated the Planning Commission would like tlic Applicant to get the access issue resolved <br />prior to bringing this application before the Planning Commission or City Council <br />The Planning Commission took no action on this application <br />SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS, CONTINUED <br />8:00 p.m. <br />(08) 02640/2641 ORONO AMBER. LLC, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, P.U.DJ <br />SUDDIVISION/REZOMNG/CO.MMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW. 8:30 p.m. - 9:17 p.m. <br />Frank Dunbar. Applicant, was present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication w ere noted <br />Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting general concept approval for a two lot plat of a <br />6.7 acre property under the PUD ordinance The Applicant is proposing a rezoning of the tw o <br />properties from B-1, Retail Sales Business District, to B-6/PUD and RPUD/PUD for multi-Eimily <br />residential use of the proposed east parcel The intended use of the properties are a three-stoc) <br />62 unit senior housing project and a 23,000 square foot office building. <br />W'einberger stated the proposed residential use of the properly would require a Comprehensive <br />Plan Amendment as the property is not guided for residential use in the 1980 Comprehensive Plan <br />PAGE 16
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.