Laserfiche WebLink
Applicatioa Dale: <br />60 Day Dcadliac; <br />12/20/00 <br />2/l8«I <br />XO: Chair I lawn and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorsc. City Administrator <br />FROM; Paul Weinberger. Zoning AdminisiratorTlanner <br />DATE: January 9.2001 <br />SUBJECT: #2651 Stephen Longman Builders Inc. on behalf of Robin and Jeremy Bupp <br />2696 Caroline Avenue <br />Variances — Public I learing <br />Zoalog DUlrici: <br />Lot Area: <br />LislofEshibib: <br />LR-IC One Family Lakcshorc Residential (Vi acre) <br />33.076 s.f.(.76acre) <br />A Application <br />B Hardship Statement <br />C Site Plan (11/28/00) <br />D Site Plan (12/28/00) <br />I; Plat Map <br />I’ Comments (James and Peggy Kadlec 1 /9'01) <br />G Property Owners Notification List <br />Background: <br />A building permit was issued June 20,2000 to construct a new house. ITic house is nearly complete <br />and a Tempc'raiy Certiftcate of Occupancy (T.C.O.) may be issued in January. 2001 At the time the <br />building pemtit was approved, the submitted site plan met all requirements ofthc zoning ordinances <br />and building code. After additional review of the site plan it was discovered the 75 ‘ lakeshore <br />setback was not measured correctly. I hc site plan indicated a 75' setback to the lakeshore (cast side <br />of the property). I lowcver, it was discovered the lakeshore bends around an adjacent property w ithin <br />75 ‘ of this property. Ihe area that should have, but was not originally included, in the 75 ‘ setback <br />is shown on Exhibit C. also note the irregular lakeshore. As a result, the area of the 75-250* zone <br />is actually smaller than initially indicated, and the owners have had to omit ceru in items of <br />hardcover to remain at the 25*/'» level. <br />When the setback issue was discovered construction of the new home had begun. Most of the <br />structure was built. Since the house was nearly complete it was not possible for the property owners <br />to reduce the size of the structure. To conform to the hardcover requirements the property owners <br />had to reduce the size of the driveway, and remove a concrete patio from the plans. Neither had been <br />constructed. A revised site plan, dated 12/28/00, has been submitted. <br />i:6$ I Sieptun iMfnun tluildcn Inc on behalf of Robin am) )««n) Bupp <br />269$ Cvolinc Avtnuc <br />Smmm -PUMicHanit <br />P«(lor4