My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
01-17-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:31:49 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:22:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 20,2000 <br />(W2640/2641 ORONO AMBAR, Conlinued) <br />GafTron stated the City could give notice to the offccicd property owners. Oaffron noted the <br />Cit>‘ normally does not mail out individual notice of the upcoming meetings once the public <br />hearing has l^en held. GafTron stated the City could send out individual notice of upcoming <br />meetings If the Plaiming Commission so desired. <br />Berg requested the president of the Suganvood Homeov\Tier*s Association be given notice of <br />any upcoming meetings concerning this application. <br />Hawn commented she is unsure what action or recommendation the Planning Commission should <br />gi\x at this time since the RPUD ordinance has not been formally adopted by the City. Hawn <br />stated in her opinion this appears to be a good plan, noting she would like to see a buffer along <br />the front of the building. Hawn requested the neighbors' concerns and comments be kept in <br />mind when revisions are bemg made to the plan. <br />Lindquist noted he is in agreement conceptually with the plan. <br />Berg commented she Is glad the developer is working with the neighbors. <br />Smith inquired whether the building materials could be specified. <br />GafTron staled the RPUD process will allow the Planning Commission to dictate what they would <br />like to see for this development. <br />Stoddard stated in his opinion more discussion is needed regarding the height of the building and <br />the parking <br />N>gard inquired how many emplot ees there would be. <br />Dunbar indicated 42 parking stalls w ould be atailable to staff, with the majority of the parking <br />area being utilized on the weekends. <br />Pat Brakeman, Suganvood, stated his major concern is with the size of the project and <br />landscaping for the wintertime. Brakeman stoicd he wt)uld like some idea of the developer's <br />agenda for this project. Brakeman stated in his view' the City does not need a cit> *w ide <br />ordinance in place prior to dealing with this project <br />GafTron stated Orono's current ordinances do not allow this t>pe of density beyond w hat's in <br />the current zoning districts, and that this ordinance is needed to permit this t)pe of housing <br />Dunbar stated he will need to meet w ith the City Council regarding the available financing before <br />bein^ able to proceed much further. Dunbar stated he wx>uld like to get some direction from die <br />Planning Commission and Cit>* Council on which direction they would like this project to go. <br />Berg commented she is awiire of other senior housing facilities consisting of two 30 unit <br />buildings rather than one large building. Berg suggested this application be tabled until the <br />ordinance amendment is adopted. <br />PAGE 28 <br />A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.