My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 12:15:12 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 12:10:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dablstrom Development LLC #02-2789/02-2840 <br />*Stonebay’ Final Development Plan Review <br />October 18,2002 <br />Page 6 <br />4.Staff would offer the following comments on a variety of topics: <br />Kelley Parkway Streetscape. Review the proposed streetscape for Kelley Parkway, focusing <br />on the width ofboulevard, sidewalk locations and connections, proposed plantings, etc. Does <br />the streetscape reflect your expectations in terms of a ‘parkway’ feel? The landscape plan <br />indicates an 8' wide boulevard except along the parking bumpouts on the north side, where <br />the sidewalk abuts the parking stalls for easy pedestrian access. The boulevard trees <br />proposed include hardwood species of red oak. ash. maple and linden, with mature heights <br />ranging from 50-75'. This mix should be adequate when mature to minimize views of the <br />building. At the proposed approximately 30’ on center spacing, this <br />should provide a heavily wooded streetscape in the far future. <br />Lighting along Kelley Parkway has not been strictly defined by the applicant or the City. <br />Applicant has provided samples of decorative lighting styles that could be used for the <br />^enor road system as well as for Kelley Parkway, for Planning Commission consideration, <br />^e primary issue is whether the City wants decorative lights with a visible lighting source <br />ining the streets (i.e. similar to the Victorian style of lights lining Highway 12 through Long <br />e), or would rather see downward cast shielded-source (“shoebox ”) lighting as we lequire <br />or parking lots. Planrung Commission is requested to make a recommendation to Council <br />on the style of lighting it would like to see within the interior of the development as well as <br />along Kelley Parkway. <br />Iiml Svslem. Look especially at the area around the stormwater pond. Do the proposed <br />trails provide the connectivity and pedestrian options the City was looking for? Are there <br />^y trail segments that need to be added or relocated within the development? Does <br />developer have a proposed staging schedule for trail development, and are you satisfied with <br />that staging plan? The City Engineer and staff recommend that all trail segments except <br />those adjacent to Highway 12 be constructed as part of the RPUD project; the current plans <br />accomplish this with the exception of the segment along Willow south of Kelley which <br />should usi be delayed pending commercial site development. <br />Building Design and Materials. Particularly consider the elevation views of the Lofls. Does <br />the root and building design enhance the development while incorporating sifficient design <br />Clements to limit the visual height impacts? Is the "court” area between the two lofts <br />uildmgs designed attractively and functionally for access and as a common entry' amenity? <br />Applicants have provided brick and stone samples and color palettes which will be available <br />or review at the PC meeting. Staff believes the proposed materials are of the high quality <br />expected, and include face brick, cast stone and ‘hardiplank’ lap siding. The shingles arc an <br />asphalt with decorative shading to give them some depth; would actual layered shingles <br />provide a better appearance a; slightly added cost?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.