My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 12:15:12 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 12:10:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dahlstrom Development LLC #02-2789/02-2840 <br />*Stonebay' Final Development Plan Review <br />October 18,2002 <br />Page 3 <br />- Jr wetland restoration areas or where prairie grasses are proposed, it would be appropriate <br />to include in the Development Agreement a long-term management plan for these areas. <br />- Irrigation system should include rain sensors to avoid watering during rain events... <br />Site layout, building design and quality : <br />- In a few of the 3 unit groupings the roof designs will concentrate roof runoff - careful <br />drainage control (positive sloping grades, gutters, or other measures) will be needed. <br />- Roof massing will be soAened by the use of layered shingles; the style proposed by <br />applicants appears to be a embossed layering rather than actual layering... <br />- While building design styles are subjective, keep in mind that the public will generally see <br />three sides of a building, so design features such as brick and stone should be carried to the <br />sides where there is high visibility. The same might be said about the rear of the 2-story <br />towrJiomes, where in many cases the rear windows and balconies look across at another <br />unit’s rear facade across the street. <br />- Again subjective but perhaps a visual issue is that many views within the development <br />involve garage doors; use of attractive door styles and window features will contribute to <br />a warmer feel of the neighborhood. <br />- Consistent use of window features may be appropriate for some types of units; the detail <br />for the 2-story townhome front facade mixes window styles (12 pane and 4-pane). Again, <br />these features might add to the quality look of the buildings without adding higher costs... <br />- The vertical brick work on the Lofrs and the use of covered entry porches helps to reduce <br />the massive look of the buildings. Are there other design features that could be added to <br />break up the long front facade? <br />- The proposed layout of the two story townhomes has been ^veaked to eliminate most <br />parking conflicts. There is still one situation just west of the main entrance whe; the first <br />2-story unit fronting on Kelley Parkway has at best only one driveway parking space <br />available without blocking the adjacent garage (See Sheet C3.3). <br />Pedestrian movement : <br />• (See Sheets C2.2 and C2.3) For the 2-story townhomes along Kelley Parkway, the interior <br />sidewalks are proposed at 3’ widths; they should be widened to 4' for two persons to <br />comfortably walk side-by-side. Most other sidewalks on the project arc proposed at 5' <br />widths; Case suggests they should be expanded to 6 ’ where feasible. In general, the <br />pedestrian w ays and connections are well located and provide for good movement around <br />the neighborhood.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.