Laserfiche WebLink
r-- <br />\ <br />M1NUTB8 OP A REGULAR MEETING UELD OECEKBER 6, 1971 <br />iltabart studied the sketch showing the <br />plsceaent of a proposed garage for Bud <br />Wheeler coastructing a residence at 1058 <br />Lo«a Linda Avenue. It would require a <br />variance fron 10* to 4* on the south side <br />and fron 3S» to 25* in front. The building <br />inspector stated he viewed the site and due <br />to a very large tree in the yard and the 50* <br />width of tiie lot, it was the only placeaent <br />possible without the renoval of the tree. <br />Elliott noved, Ryerse seconded, that tiie <br />variance be recoimended, conditioned on the <br />neighbor's approval, ilotion. Ayes (8) - <br />Nays (0). <br />Page 2 <br />VARIAMCE <br />1058 Lo«a Linda A«*enue <br />i4enbers studied the application of Frank <br />Xokesh dividing off 6 acres fron an 11.33 <br />acre parcel, legally described as Parcel <br />5500, Sec. 31. <br />Since the division net the requirenents of <br />the zoning ordinance. <br />Hays noved, Nicliolls seconded, tiiat approval <br />bo recon«ended, but that Mr. Kokesh be reninded <br />he net the requirenents of municipal ordinance <br />1132 but he possibly wottld not be covered by <br />that ordinance in the <br />Ayes (8) • Nays (0). <br />future. Motion, <br />DIVISION <br />4100 Watertown Road <br />Soutnworth read the let tor «lr. Lowry wrote <br />to the Village setting forth tne purpose <br />of the Nature Conservancy and the goals of <br />the property owners dedicating their marsh­ <br />land to thi:* organization--this letter to <br />become a natter of record in the file. <br />Elliott asked about the valuation of the <br />property being dedicated and was informed <br />that with the exception of a few snail <br />nortions that the Nature Conservancy <br />purchased, the valuation placed on by tho <br />assessor was only nominal. Nicholls asked <br />about the nanageme.tt of the property after <br />the Nature Conservancy would take over and <br />Mr. Lowry inforned hin it was to be nanaysd by <br />a committee of 5. 3 fron the adjacent <br />neighbors and 2 Iron the conservancy and that <br />bylaws were drawn up as to its care. The <br />tn <br />NATURE CONSERVANCY <br />question as to whether this would be private <br />or public property and <lr. Low^ stated he <br />Might it would be <br />. _ jbl< <br />than at the present time. <br />thought it would be private and that the <br />problem of snowmobiles would be no different <br />(Continued) <br />■ <br />W" <br />WM- <br />i ’-i' • <br />k ...