Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 19,2002 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />Smith once again asked if the Commission were willing to give a little bit on the square footage. <br />Mabusth stated that the original home had 660 s.f of hardcover and felt it justified to hold the <br />new residence to that figure, yet she stressed how important it was to maintain the 53’ setback. <br />Smith asked if this meant up to the 50’ DNR recommendation. <br />Fritzler and Bremer stated that they would adhere to the approved 53’ and no less. <br />Mabusth stated that she would like to know how deep the proposed overhang would be. <br />Rahn stated that he could support the 50’ setback. <br />Ms. Welch asked the Commission to set the parameters for her and she would take them back to <br />Mr. Welch to redesign and meet those. <br />Mabusth reiterated that the applicant not exceed the 660 s.f and maintain a 50’ setback, and <br />asked her to have the surveyor mark tlic eave depth and distance from the take on the survey the <br />next time around. <br />Ms. Welch felt she had enough to go on. <br />Rahn still questioned the overhang status. <br />Mabusth pointed out that if a structure meets setback, it is a legal nonencroachment if the eaves <br />overhang 1 1/2’; however, since this structure does not fall within the legal setback of 75’, the <br />overhangs are counted into the equation. <br />Smith moved, Fritzler seconded, to table Application #02-2813, Mark Welch, 3625 North <br />Shore Drive, to allow the applicant time for redesign purposes. VOTE; Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PAGE 21 <br />A J