Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OFTHE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMNUSSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 19,2002 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />Smith asked Mr. Liberman if he could support the shift if the arborvitae remained, <br />• • <br />Mr. Liberman stated that he could support the shift if the arborvitae did remain. <br />Ms. Welch indicated that she believed the applicant could leave the shrubbery or the equivalent. <br />Smith indicated that the Commission seemed to favor the shift but had difficulty supporting the <br />eaves and “prow”. <br />Fritzler stated that, as proposed, he could not support the extending peak or “prow”, he felt the <br />front either had to be straight across or moved back further into the house. <br />Mabusth and Bremer felt the applicant needed to maintain a 53 ’ setback. <br />Rahn stated that he liked the new design. <br />Smith stated that she liked thf, ‘^;“ow” but wanted to see it at 53*. She questioned whether the <br />Commission could support them back the original 660 s.f of hardcover. She indicated <br />that she could see that three of the Commissioners felt no additional hardcover was warranted. <br />Ms. VV'elch argued that this new home application differs from the Melin existing home <br />application due to the investment being made and the fact that this home would not ever be <br />allowed any decking. <br />Bremer argued that this application could support a deck if the home being proposed were <br />smaller. The similarity to Melin is merely that they both fall under the 1,500 s.f. hardcover. <br />Smith suggested the applicants table the application in order to redesign the plan, pulling back <br />the “prow” a bit to maintain the 53 ’ and coming back again. <br />PAGE 20