My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:04:08 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 4:00:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
« <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />2750 Kelley Parkway <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />952-249-4600 <br />ZONING HLE //02-2789 <br />NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE OF NOTICE: June 13, 2002 <br />TO:Dahlstrom Development LLC <br />7745 Polaris Lane <br />Maple Grove, MN 55311 Landform <br />510 First Avenue North #650 <br />Minneapolis, MN 55403 <br />COPIES:Orono Plaza <br />•Attn: Tom Reiersgord Malkcrson Gilliland Martin LLP <br />Reiersgord Law Firm Suite 1500 AT&T Tower <br />4500 West 44th Street 901 Marquette Avenue <br />Minneapolis, MN 55424-1001 Minneapolis, MN 55402-3205 <br />TYPE OF APPLICATION: Comp Plan Amendment / PUD Rezoning / Subdivision / <br />PUD Development - Concept Plan Stage <br />DATE OF MEETING: June 10, 2002 <br />Council Action: <br />1. Motion to support the Comprehensive Plan Amendment reques for conversion from <br />“commercial office ” use to “multifamily residential” use (and rezoning from RR-IB to <br />RPUD) for the area between Highway 12 and Kelley Parkway. <br />Vote: 2 Ayes (Sansevere, Nygard), 3 Nays (White, Murphy, Peterson) <br />Motion Failed <br />2. Motion to deny the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request for conversion from <br />“commercial office ” use to “multifamily residential” use (and rezoning from RR-IB to <br />RPUD) for the area between Highway 12 and Kelley Parkw-ay. <br />\'ote: 3 Ayes (White, Murphy, Peterson), 1 Nay (Nygard), 1 Abstention (Sansevere) <br />Motion Carried <br />These Council actions reflect that the Concept Plan as proposed is not acceptable. Council <br />made no further motions. Some Councilmembers individually commented regarding their <br />preferred level or types of retail uses that might be allowed at the southeast comer of the <br />property, but suggested that no commitment would be forthcoming until applicants amend their <br />application and provide a revised concept plan for consideration.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.