My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:04:08 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 4:00:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minnesota: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. A 1 4 >1_____ <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />FINDINGS <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2390. <br />The property is located in the LR-IB, Zoning District, where 1 acre is the <br />minimum lot area. The property consists of .33 acres or 14,663 sq. ft. <br />The Planning Commission re'-iewed this application on August 17, 1998 and <br />recommended approval on a vote of 4 to 2. <br />4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A. The subject lot does not meet lot width or lot area requirements. <br />B. This property is allowed to have 1,978.25 sq. ft. (25%) of the total lot <br />area in the 75-250' setback in hardcover. The City Council determined <br />per Resolution No. 3926 that the total amount of hardcover to be located <br />within the 75-250 ’ setback shall be reduced by the amount of existing <br />hardcover (1,320.75 sq. ft.) in the 0-75' setback. <br />C. A portion of the yard between the house and the street is located in a <br />flood plain area. <br />5.The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring propert>’; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstra ’.'le hardship or difficulty; is necessar}' to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.