My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:34:57 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:30:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TlIK <br />ORO.NO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 19, 2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Rahn stated the unK other comment lie liad regarding the ordinance is under Item /O. which reads "all <br />rtxifed structures that extend more than 6' abo\e grade lexel'’ Rahn stated he would like that to read <br />all roofed structures more than 6” abo\e grade le\el Rahn stated m Ins opinion the word extend gives <br />the impression of a hori/ontal extension rather than v ertical <br />Havvn stated it is her understanding this is addressing structures that are cantilevered <br />Rahn stated he understood it related to structures over six feet m height <br />GafTron stated he is m agreement with Rahn that the word extend is somewhat confusing and that the <br />word extend could be eliminated without changing the meaning of the ordmanee <br />Haw n moved, Mabusth seconded, to recommend approval of Application #01-2735, Proposed <br />Amendment of Zoning C'ode, Section 10.03, Subd. 14, Lot Coverage by Structures Standards, <br />with the words, which extend, being removed from Item #1 under Section 1. <br />\'0'1 E: Ayes 5, Nays 1, Smith Opposed. <br />Smith indicated she voted in opposition to the motion because in her opinion swimming pools should be <br />included in lot coverage <br />(#04) #2333 PROPOSKI) ZONING CODE A.MENDMENT, SECTION 10.20 SUBD. 4C, <br />HOME OCCUPATION STANDARDS <br />GafTron stated before the Planning Commission tonight is a summarv of the conclusions reached during <br />the December 20”' work session Galfron stated Section I eliminates provisions for home vKcupaiion <br />licensing and makes them an aecessorx use m residential z(»ncs <br />(iaffron stated the proposed zoning code amendment also elimiiutes most of the performance standards <br />tliat were included m the current zoning code Section revises the Home Oecupalion accessory use <br />entry as it appears m the list of R-l A allowed accessory uses fhe new language requires tlut all home <br />PAGE 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.