Laserfiche WebLink
MINMKSOKTHE <br />ORONO PLANNING C OMMISSION <br />Tuc*>day, February 19, 2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />/.oiling code dealing with structural lot coxerage ordinance standards Mottenberg noted the Planning <br />Commission had discussed this item in a number of work sessions, and inquired whether there were any <br />changes or concerns b\ the Planning Comimssion relating to diis item <br />Kluth noted they were still working with the percentages <br />Hawn commented the last time the\ rexiewed this item the> discussed the fact that this proposed <br />amendment would aflect \er\ few pioperties but would require a large minibcr of properties to ha\e <br />hardcover calculations done Hawn stated it was her understanding the Planning Coniniission had <br />decided at that tune not to continue to pursue this item <br />Mabiisth stated that was her understanding as well <br />Kluth stated the PImining Coniniissioii did request StaITto draft the nuKlel ordinance <br />I lawn stated the ordinance dws not include anything about non-lakeshore lots and percentage of <br />liardcov cr on these lots <br />Sniith stated it was her understanding prxiis were to be included in the hardcover, which appaiently lias <br />changed since Uie last work session <br />Mabusth stated Smith is correct, noting that Smith and I.indqiiist were opposed to the ordinance since <br />swimming pwls were not included in the hardcover calculations, with the rest of the Planning <br />('oimmssion being in favor of the proposed amendment <br />I lawn indicated what she was referring to was her proposal tlut non-lakeshore pioperties. in an elTort to <br />insure that those lots did not have a large amount of hardcover on them, was to put a percentage limit on <br />those properties as well as lakcshore lots Hawn staled since then StalFs studv has demonstrated that a <br />limit on tliose lots is not needed at this lime <br />Rahil inquired whether the Plaiimng ('oimmssion should put a .'5 percent limit on the >(MM0(j(i' setback <br />area <br />.Mabusth commented Stall did a survev of non-lakeshore lots and found that it was not an issue <br />pa(;f2