Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1^2755 Long Lake Fire Station Site <br />February 1 5,2002 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Preliminary Plat Drawing/Survey <br />B - Site Plan <br />C - Wetland Mitigation Plans <br />D • Stormwater Ponding Plan <br />E - Fire Station Elevation Views <br />F - Comments by Adjacent Neighbor <br />G - Applications <br />H - Plat Map <br />I - Property Owners List <br />Factors Affecting Site Layout <br />The site plan for the Fire Station has been developed by the joint Fire Station Committee and reviewed <br />by both City Councils. Site layout has been significantly influenced by a number of factors including: <br />1) the necessary north-south building orientation to allow for direct fire apparatus c.xit onto Willow <br />Drive without requiring additional turning movements; <br />2) driveway aprons required on east and west sides of the building bays to allow for fire apparatus <br />ingress/egress, necessitating that administrative and training spaces be located on the north or <br />south ends of the building; <br />3) road / driveway access to the rear of the building must uilow for the necessary wide turning <br />radius of fire apparatus; <br />4) pro,ximity to the e.xisting/future Willow Drive bridge over the RR and the new Highway 12 <br />route; <br />5) site li:nitations imposed by width of the site, as well as by the location of existing linear wetlands <br />on the site, and the need to create a road corridor to provide access to the rear of the property for <br />future residential use; <br />6) soil condition^ which requite extensive soil correction work and which limit use of the southerly <br />portion of the site for building purposes. <br />1. Proposed Subdivision <br />The intent of the subdivision is to create a building lot for the fire station and a future residential parcel <br />behind it which will likely ultimately be developed lor single family, senior housing or other residential <br />use not yet determined. Future use of the residential parcel is likely to be the subject of a rezoning to <br />cither RPUD or some new’ zoning district allowing SFR at 2-3 units per acre. Therefore, the 2-acrc <br />minimum area requirement for the RR-1B zone would not necessarily come into plav (if this is an issue <br />for Planning Commission, the residential site could be platted as an outlet, requiring future City approval <br />to use it as a building site). The fronl/back lot configuration requires that a road or dri vew ay corridor be