My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:34:57 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:30:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINIJTKSOF THK <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 19, 2002 <br />6:30 o ’clock p.m. <br />issues are resolved prior lo proceedmii to the Cit> Council Mabusth stated tlie issues relating to access <br />and grading and drainage should be resolved prior to approaching Council <br />Kluth stated the Planning Commission could approve this application subject to certain conditions <br />Smith inquired whether the Planning Commission should review this application once those issues are <br />resolved. <br />Hawn staled in her v iew the Planning Coininission does not have enough information to determine <br />exactly how close the garage should be to the house <br />Kluth stated a lot of these limitations are self-imposed by the architectural stvie of the house rather than <br />bv the land <br />9 <br />Rahil inquired where the Applicants were at on hardcover <br />Weinberger stated they arc well below on the hardcover limits allowed on this propcrlv <br />Hawn inquired e.xactiv what other information is still needed as far as drainage and grading <br />Weinberger stated the approv al of the design is subject to the approv al of the City linginccr <br />Weinberger stated the City Lngineer only reviewed an architectural plan of the grading prior to this <br />meeting, which showed the house and garage located closer to the vvethuid than the plan before the <br />Planning Commission <br />Hawn stated she has gotten the impression from the other Planning Commission members that the <br />garage located closer to the house <br />Mabusth stated she would like to hear from the City Engineer on how far back the house can be moved <br />back, which niav allow the garage to be relocated <br />riavvn inquired whether this appitcalion should be tabled or have the approval subject to a number of <br />conditions I lawn stated she personallv devs not have a problem vv ith the application, and if the garage <br />IS relocated closer to the house, the Planning Commission in her view should rev lew it again <br />Kluth staled the idea behind relocating the garage is to get it out of the wetland area <br />PAGE 16
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.