Laserfiche WebLink
nbers Background: The applicant’s initial proposal was more expansive than tF <br />Planning Commission. After reviewing the application, staff discussed <br />the lot with the applicant, explaining that structural coverage on the lot v <br />be over the allowed 15% by city code. The applicant decided to go forw; <br />some modifications. The size of the proposed lot coverage by structures <br />s.f. (14.98%) meeting the 15% structural coverage for the lot. However, <br />zone is still exceeds the allowed amount. <br />[unii] <br />District (.5 acre) <br />• Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area; Proposed to be 6,248 s.f. <br />exceeds the 25% hardcover allowed by Orono ordinance for new <br />(18.69%). The entire structure is located within the 75-250' .scibu <br />The proposed plan locates the new residence behind the average lakcsho <br />coverage by structures is located within the 75-250' setback area. Massing <br />of the setback area. The structure is 3.297 s.f. (14.98%) w hich is w ell be <br />riTlVAVBIIil <br />If the applicant were to move the residence e\en further back on the pr( <br />requirements in the 75-250' setback area a couple things would happen: <br />• The average lakeshore setback would change for the adjacent <br />properties decide to redevelop they would need to be located furl <br />than currently exist. A domino would occur, with each new resideiv <br />further back on the lot and closer to Concordia Street. Do we wan <br />closer to Concordia Street? The proposed location keeps the new rt <br />the neighborhood and minimizes the domino effect, but results in <br />sicnra <br />siiDari] <br />rdco\cr in 0-75 ’: Within 75 ‘ of <br />lo permit 252 s.f (3.27“o) <br />Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area is over the allowed 25®/l <br />required 25®/o. approximately 2,673 s.f of hardcover would need <br />averages about 215' deep and is 102' wide. <br />irdcover in 75-250'; Within 75- <br />r. To permit 6,248 s.f (43.69%) <br />d or accessorv structure shall be <br />rmit a variance to allow existing <br />■rty and are requesting hardcover <br />construct a new residence on the <br />Statement of Hardship: <br />The applicant has included his statement of hardship in Exhibit F. The <br />asked for his testimony regarding this issue. <br />Drainage: The applicant did not submit a drainage plan with the appli <br />needs to be approved by city staff prior to City Council review of this ap <br />Issues for Consideration: <br />I. A residence currently exists on the property in a non-conforming Icv <br />and will be removed. <br />f^02-2?40 JcJJry'd Sanc}' T\ud\\ ell <br />IS65 Concordia Sired <br />Variances <br />I/1 1/2002 <br />Page 2