Laserfiche WebLink
ft ^ <br />MINiniS OF A PLANNING OCWUSSION ICETING <br />requested a Wetland Variance and a Variance <br />fjpf Ordu^ No. 167, on filling and grading, for the purpose <br />Of providing a high, diy area on vtfiich to store his ciuissr. <br />The Zo^g Administrator expressed his opinion that the pro­ <br />posed fill may obstiuct the natural drainage and ponding in <br />^ ma. and could be a visu^ obstruction for the neighbors. <br />Van Nest moved. Hake seconded, that the Planning Conmission <br />recamiOTd to the Coiticil that the request of Roget Swanstrom <br />TO denied because there are suitable boat stevaro aieas at <br />m site that do not need filling and that Mf. Swartsttttll be <br />advised that the boat could not be stored beyond the front <br />setback line of the house. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). <br />Wd Rovick made application for four variahces in order to <br />build a hoTO on his property at 1055 West Ifemdale Poad. The <br />tract consists of .75 acres or 32,670 sq. ft. and is presently <br />zroed at two acres. The variances requested vrere (1) Area - <br />54,450 sq. ft. (2) Lot width of 25 ft. (3) Side Yard set- <br />back of 15 ft. and (4) Street Setback of 33 ft. Tne location <br />would meet the 75 ft. lakeshore setback requiremmt according <br />to the application. The Coninission noted that there was no <br />adjoii^ vacant property by the site and that the tract was <br />held in single separate ownership. During the discussion, a <br />z^resentative from Gessco Builders, appeared in behalf of <br />^ proceeded to discuss the building plans <br />Ji the Conmission. Additional problems conceming a deck <br />:adied to the house and within the lakeshore setback, were <br />noted, as was the necessity of a hardcover variance. Mention <br />was made that the present plans were to have a holding tank <br />in place of a septic system at the site. After the problems <br />were evaluated. Van Nest moved, Hannah seconded, that the <br />Plam^g Conmission recommend to the Council approval of the <br />application due to the hardship caused by the small size of <br />the lot, because no adjoining land was available, and because <br />™ pr^rty w^ in sin^a^separate ownership although the <br />following conditions are mer: (1) lhat the sewage system be <br />a^roved by the Village Engineer (2) That the Building Peimit <br />cite specific Village restrictions on filling, grading and tree <br />remwal and oust be 75 ft. from the lakeshore. (3) In ad­ <br />dition to the variances requested in the application, a 231 <br />variance on hardcover be allowed (4) That the deck, cs shown <br />TO the plan, within 75 ft. of the lakeshore be allowed provided <br />it IS of open type, raised construction with — beneath and <br />that no concrete be used. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). <br />ROGER SWANSTRGM <br />1580 BOHNS POINr ROAD <br />WETTANDS VARIANCE <br />• II ROVICK <br />1055 WEST FEI94DALE ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />There was no one present to represent the subdivision request <br />of Ulmer Construction Company. Dunlap moved, Hannah seconded, <br />that the petition be tabled until the next meeting and directed <br />the Zoning Administrator to noti^’ the ^jplicant that even if <br />one is in attendance at that time the matter will be acted <br />Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays CO). <br />UI>€R CONSTRUCTION 00. <br />70, 130 6 160 WILLOW DR <br />The Planning Commission went into the work session part of their WORK SESSION <br />mroting consisting of review of pending qjplications and discus­ <br />sion of matters of interest to the Planning Conmission. <br />\ •« <br />»■I'l <br />-i <br />■Iv <br />4■■■i <br />S' <br />I <br />! ?I 4