Laserfiche WebLink
o <br />c <br />CITY OF •MM. <br />Regular Meeting of the Planning Conmission, May 19 <br />1975 <br />The Planning Conraission met on the above date with <br />the following members present: Chaiiman Guthrie» <br />Van Nest, Curtis, Kallestad, Hannah, McDonald, ^sent: <br />Gasch, Pesek, Hake, Wooley, Dunlap. <br />Guthrie opened I^iblic Heaiiijg on vacation of a portion <br />of land on Lake View Ave. <br />Mr. Spears set forth his request for the vacation of <br />this small triangle of land. <br />Van Nest stated that the City Attorney would like the <br />Plaiming Commission and Council to consider what pro­ <br />vision for docks would be across the street from this <br />street vacation. He suggested a trade of parcels with <br />Mr. Spears receiving the triangle he requested in ex­ <br />change for giving the Village the small triangle on the <br />lakeshore. Mr. Spears did not feel this would be a <br />fair exchange, and plained that when the Park Comnis- <br />sion was offered this property at an earlier date, they <br />did not think it was worth anything. <br />The IHiblic Hearing was clnsed at 7:50 p.m. <br />Van Nest moved, Hannah seconded recommendation to the <br />Village Council for approval granting this vacation on <br />the following conditions: <br />1. That staff confiim that this vacation will not cause <br />any future problems with right-of-ways, streets, or <br />utility easements. <br />2. The Village wants legal descriptions confirmed by <br />our City Attorney. <br />3. If this is approved by Village Council, applicants <br />attorney-would draw upaQuit Claim Deed. <br />4. Because of statements made during the preliminary <br />approval of this plat indicating that some dockage would <br />^ allowed on Stubbs Bay, and b^ause the road now is not <br />in the locaticHi as represented during the preliminary plat <br />approval, and because we are vacating to applicant on the <br />north side of the road, and strip of land remaining on <br />swth side of the road is smaller than \dien we gave pre­ <br />liminary approval, that this releases us from any moral <br />or le^l obligation that we may have to grant a dock <br />and we are making no coomitment at this time vdiether or <br />not docks would be permitted on this strip; the land <br />being only 8' on the west boundary tapering down to 0* <br />on the east boundary line. Motion, Ayes (6), Nay (0). <br />7:47 p.m. <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />i <br />—* ^