Laserfiche WebLink
rr ■ <br />MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD MAY 21, 1973 <br />Kullberg aoved, Guthrie seconded, that the <br />approval of a variance for four horses and <br />a 75* setback be approved, subject to the <br />reviewal and approval by the Park Comaission <br />for their conaents. Motion, jAyes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Ryerse moved, Kullberg secouded, that a <br />variance be granted in the widtn and acreage <br />requirement for Parcels 2700 Q 2S00 in <br />Tonkaview Gardens because such a request <br />is coapatihle with the character of the <br />neighborhood and because it would be impossible <br />for Mr. Hill to acquire any more property. <br />Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Page 3 <br />VARIANCE <br />(Continued) <br />VARIANCE <br />Hill <br />Mr. Starkey explained that the road that would DIVISION <br />provide access to the new lots curved as it Starkey <br />approached County Road 16 because of the <br />terrain. Mr. Starkey was also agreeable to <br />extending an easement to the south lot line <br />as well as move the east-west easement shown <br />on the preliminary plat S' to the south to <br />allow the existing home an adequate setback <br />for a side yard facing a street. <br />Paurus moved, Ryerse seconded, that approval <br />of the division be granted, subject to the <br />adequate dedication of the 50' easements <br />for present and future roads and utilities. <br />Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Gasch asked for an explanation of the VARIANCE <br />percolation test supplied by Mills Engineering. Mondale <br />Mr. Mondale claimed that Mr. Scheller, the <br />Building Inspector, informed him that the test <br />indicated that an adequate septic system could <br />be constructed. <br />Gasch moved, Guthrie seconded, that a variance <br />be granted since this subdivision had been <br />created before the present zoning ordinance <br />and the Mondale lot was the same size as the <br />surrounding lots that have been developed. <br />Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Mr. Bohn explained that his existing home <br />was destroyed by fire and he would like to <br />move the location of the new home to meet <br />the 10' setback requirement but not move it <br />so far that a new well would be required. <br />The new home would be 70' from the lake, <br />which would be in line with the surrounding <br />homes but because of the shape of the lot <br />would require a variance of 60' in lot width. <br />VARIANCE <br />Bohn <br />(Continued)