Laserfiche WebLink
%1HUTBS OP A RKULAR MBETIHO HELD HOVEMBBR 19, 1973 page 2 <br />WAHB; <br />Hr . ^nhardus:COMMENTS: COMMENTS;' <br />Bi© neighbors concern la more over the operators <br />involved and not the ski facility itself. Purther <br />expansion of the operation would tend to increase <br />the need for a buffer around the facility like most <br />other major ski areas have. A large ski area Im- <br />madlately adjacent to a residential area is not <br />compatible. <br />Mr. Brooks:Present Village ordinances have been violated by <br />constructing the ski tows before approval had been <br />granted for a conditional use permit. This is an <br />example of Mr. Primua’ attitude and actions tdiloh <br />have been a constant source of Irritation for the <br />re'vhbors. <br />Mr, Miner:No proof was submitted by Mr. Primus that expansion <br />of the ski facilities is necessary. <br />After all the people present were afforded an <br />opportunity to speak Van Nest Moved, Elliott <br />seconded that the public hearing be closed at <br />9:15 P.M. <br />In the lli^t of the petition submitted by the <br />adjoining property owners, Comalssloner Van <br />felt that Coxinoll should review the con­ <br />ditional use permit that was granted to the <br />original operation. Van Neat also felt that <br />Mr. Primus did not give adequate Justification <br />for the need to expand the existing facilities. <br />Raving a ski facility in Orono la in itself de­ <br />sirable, but such an operation must be run in a <br />way which is compatible with the residential <br />area which it is in. <br />Van Nest moved. Hays seconded that the request <br />to expand the oondlAlfillAl use permit to Parrel <br />2300 Plat 4.^ 33^ yba denlecQand the Council ahould <br />consider review!^ tne original permit in light <br />of the petition that was submitted by the surround- <br />ing property owners. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) <br />Xullberg abstained. <br />Chalman Paurus suggested that i-ather than the <br />Planning Commission voting on a particular lot <br />sise, that each member should express what they <br />feel would be appropriate. Paurus, Kullberg, <br />Van Neatp Oaaohp and Kays supported two acre <br />lots while Elliott supported five acre lots in <br />unsewered areas. <br />MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN <br />UNSEWBRED AREAS <br />O <br />Mr. Anderson's request for a division was tabled <br />xxntil December.HAROLD ANDERSON <br />The North Star request involves a conditional <br />use permit for a seawall, a variance from NORTH STAR MARINA <br />(Continued)