06-25-1979 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

March 5, 1975 Richard Proudfit 3220 Navarre Lane Conditional Use Permit Page 2 ■ i b) limited physical use of site - For example - parking limited to five cars, c) Ignorance of facts upon sale of land. d) vandalism - police state this has improved. e) others? 3. Doesn't this application also involve a variance to the Zoning Code? PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - MARCH 12, 1979 Planning Connilsslon advised applicant that his application appears to be In violation of the Zoning Code. It was suggested that his 4>pllcatlon should be for rezonlng. He was advised to consult with staff concerning thg proper application for his proposed and/or existing use of property at 3220 Navarre Lane. STAFF UPDATE - APRIL 17, 1979 Staff met with Richard Proudfit and his attorney, Allan T. Quello. Mr. Proudfit reviewed the type of activities conducted on the premises. The company carries on a limited production schedule, preparation of "pre-production" samples and research and development activities. The firm employs five full time, day time employees and two employees on a night shift. The night schedule could run as late as midnight depending on the work load. There are usually three to four cars on the premises at one time and the U.P.S. makes deliveries and pickups during the week. We advised the applicant that this kind of activity could not continue In a residential-zoned neighborhood. Not only do the ordinances specifically prohibit such use, but the size of the lot In relation to the ambitious activities make It an Impossibility. The lot could * never afford the necessary parking. The City would allow the use as a temporary one. It was agreed that the developer would be responsible for phasing out the entire operation by May 1, 1980. The applicant felt the decision to be a fair one. Staff advised him to continue with the Conditional Use Application and to submit a current survey of the subject property.