Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT 6 <br />Page 1 <br />Hennepin Cty. DOT <br />Minn. Stat« DOT <br />r.-ZjLif <br />L.HO) <br />IsteXjElSJ <br />.i.,6 <br />. ^ <br />•• <br />STAFF COMI-IENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br />SUGGESTED FINDINGS rfTf- <br />tr-* <br />condition, .pplying to the .troctufc or land iii que.tion are p.cuUar to auch ptoperty or <br />in whJch*®*ld'*3»^^l ®PP*y 9«^nerally to oOter 3*nd Of atrurtuirt in the diatriet <br />^i* conditions applying to the structuie or lend In question sre not f>ecu1isr to such property or <br />Rradistely surrounding property but do apply generally to other lend or structures In the district in <br />which said lend is located. <br />Ihe granting of the application ___ is is not necessary for the preservation and enjcyn«nt of a <br />aubstantial property right of the applicant. <br />Ihs granting of the proposed variance will not in any way iir.pair the public health, safety, confort* <br />morals or general welfare; Oil <br />The granting of the proposed variance ituiy inipalr Uie public health, safety, coralort. rorals or <br />general welfare. <br />The granting cf the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of the Co.-rpiehensive Land Usa <br />Plan or the Zoning Code; OP <br />The granting of the proposed variance would be contrary to the intent of the Cor?.prehensSve Land Use <br />Plan or the Zoning Code. <br />such variance will r>ot irterely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary <br />to alleviate demonstrated hardships or difficulties; OP <br />Ihe applicant has demonstrated no recognized hardship or difficulty and therefore the granting of sudi <br />variance would merely serve as a convenience to such applicant. <br />SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL <br />3. <br />r