03-12-1979 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.11..J11.S OF A PUVsLNG O3;iUSS10N ItliTING IfKLD AUCWST 2, 1976 -PAGE 2 Pesek moved, ^thrie seconded, that the minutes of the Plying Commission meeting of July 19, 1976, be approved. Motion - Ayes (8), Nays (0). Mr Peterson explained to the Planning Coirmission that he had purdiased this property about 1 year ago. He under- sto^ there were misunderstandings, but felt that the problems had been solved. The Peterson's purchased this property in good faith. Pesek moved. Van 1,'est seconded, to approve this variance because it is after the fact and the pool has been tliere for the past three years. Pesek felt that this was not a violation by the Peterson’s idio purchased the property only one year ago. They were unfortunate to inherit an existing non-confonning situation w)iich was never before brought to the attention of staff. Motion - Ayes (8), Nays (0)T Mr. Curtis ivas in attendance and presented pictures of his property. After a short discussion, ?-fcDonald moved, Pesek seconded, to grant approval of this variance because the proposed addition wuld be replacing the substandard leanto portiOT of the house and it would in no way encroach on the existing setbacks, htotion - Ayes (8), Nays (0). The Zoning Administrator presented the building plans to ^e ConmissiOT. Mr. Ryan was present to explain his plans for this additiCHI. Van Nest moved, Guthrie seconded, to recoinmend approval subject to providing fire separations as r^^r^ by the State Code and the combinaticjn of all the ^dividual parcels and vacated street. The subject of the vacated street should be referred to the attorney to resolve its actual status. were in attendance. Mrs. Smith explained to the Conmission that at the start of the construction they instructed the contractor not to disturb the trees that were on the property in order to build the house. The l^ation of the house was then moved over to avoid removing the trees. The inspector was never informed of the change in lcx:atian. Larry Shaw, a neighbor to ^e north of the Smith’s was also present at the meeting. He expressed his disappointment with the building of this u *1* n*cntioned that he conplained several times to Uie building inspector regarding the building location. Smith’s home blocks his view of the lake. The Planning Commission felt that the only question here was the rear yard setback as the new sideyard setback requirements. Pesek mov^, Hake second^, approval of this variance ecause the house is finished. However granting this ^nsti^te approval for a private dock OT the shoreline strip directly across the street. Motion - Ayes (8), Nays (0). CALL TO ORDER - 8:20 P.M. RRGUIJVR fEETING APPRO\'AL OF MINUreS hEETING JULY 19, 1976 V:^YNE PETERSON 1359 PARK DRIVE VARIANCE - SIDE YAPJ) SETBACK maiAEL CURTIS 4200 NORTH 3I0RE DRIVE VARIANCE - LOT AREA 6 WIDTH FRED RYAN 1345 NORTH ARM DRIVE VARIANCE - SETBACK BETIVEEN STRUCTURES TRAVIS SmiH - 1945 EAGERNESS POINT ROAD VARIANCE - REAR YARD SETBACK