Laserfiche WebLink
• i' <br />1. Was the only purpose stated ^as the reason for the interceptor. <br />2. This was not included in the original intent to provide the interdeptor nzniinfixaaGaiiiOBBii^^ <br />3. Totally inconsistent with 0 Co^> Land Use Plan <br />4. Vocational School not within planned construction for 20*25 years if ever. <br />5. We agreed with this statewnt but feel it should be expanded to include it as <br />the prinary basic reason for wihich the interceptors are l^ing provid^. <br />6. IXiring the past 2 or 3 years water level of Lake Mtka has reeained relatively <br />stable even thou^the sewagf <br />mBDCMkh of th? <br />7 • U <br />7. The Medina Interceptor decision does not seen to be a fine decision at this tine <br />and m 4nel grave doubts for its need^y^nT« <br />8. This statenent does not reflect the problens encountered with the instability <br />of marsh lands and the difficulties o£ access to the various naidioles located <br />in the marshes. o»U{.La^v <br />9. This point was not the original purpose of the interceptor and althou^ it is <br />a true statement it should be expand^ to reflect the adverse effects of increased <br />uibmization beyond a tolor^le level in order to preserve the qualities of Lake <br />Mtha'lkn.o <br />10. Great concern is expressed to the potential damage created by this distrubance <br />area thru our marsh areas. <br />11.This statenent should be expanded to include the secmdary effects of dreeing <br />to the environment and the potential release of thousands of years of storec <br />phosphorus and other nutriesnts within the material that will be dredged. <br />12. This statenent be expanded to include the fact that this method of <br />installation would have minimal effect to nutrient release of dredged materials <br />and also destruction of marsh lands <br />1 <br />13. This statenent again does not reflect the difficulaties of gravity sewer within <br />marsh areas vrith great land instability and difficSlti access paeUana* for continuing <br />maintenance problems. <br />14. 'fnT^is state nne t should be greatly expanded as the potential tax for infiltration <br />due to marsh instability and other maintenance problens is a critical problem <br />in the eyes of Orono based on our |Mst experience in marsh areas. <br />15. This statcannt should expand on the disadvantages caused from infiltration, because <br />of the proposed location of the interceptor. <br />Bctixata <br />statenent <br />we do not feel that alternative 1 justifies this <br />_does not reflect the <br />planned but __ <br />J^ake mfirii caused by the <br />interceptor were to be <br />of ilii iiilyn i<i iaiiil miiwil 111 effect