Laserfiche WebLink
m f <br />« « <br />■"^yjRv <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MAY 5, 1980 - PAGE 3 <br />3.Neighbors on both sides have signed petition <br />stating approval of the improvement and benefit <br />to their property values (on file City offices). <br />4.Property was charged four sewer units and <br />four water charges and all of the residential <br />units are connected to the municipal sewer <br />and water systems. <br />MILTON SEIFERT <br />1856 Shadywood Road <br />VARIANCE <br />(#548) Cont. <br />5.The residents on the subject property have never <br />carried on activities inconsistent with neighbor's <br />use of their property "as being a high quality <br />residential area". <br />Adams questioned whether the removal of paved parking <br />area and portion of the driveway turnaround will <br />create even more violations and hazardous conditions. <br />How will the resident's parking needs by satisfied? <br />Freeberg said there is still enough area by the main <br />house to allow adequate turnaround space since all <br />parking by residents will be located near the garages <br />on Shadywood. Each unit will have an assigned stall <br />in the garages and there is a gravel parking area that <br />can serve five cars. Adams asked staff to have the <br />City engineer review the proposed layout to make certain <br />that there is a satisfactory turnaround area. <br />Jabbour noted that additional sodded areas could be <br />paved without the City being notified because building <br />permits are not required. He strongly suggested a <br />formal C.U.P. be required to continue the non-conforming <br />use of 4 residential units on a single residential lot. <br />Wilson noted the difficulty in reviewing this proposal <br />given the persuasive presentation by Mr. Pearson, but <br />he is still troubled by the lakeshore cabin. He felt <br />the Planning Commission would be neglecting their <br />responsibility if the issue of removing the lakeshore <br />unit was not addressed. <br />Pearson noted that his client could consider removing <br />the subject cabin in five years but asked if at that <br />time the substructure could remain to serve as a boat <br />house. <br />r