Laserfiche WebLink
o <br />© <br />MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MAY 5, 1980 - PAGE 2 <br />Lowe and Baumgardner reflected on the original <br />restrictive covenants that controlled the area <br />and the limited density desired. <br />Hammerel asked Mr. Hepp to review the background <br />of the "Hannah driveway". He explained that the <br />easement was created before he was the owner of <br />the property and that the 14' easemeiit was created <br />to allow access for a landlocked parcel created <br />in a lot line realignment. <br />BRUCE HEPP <br />2605 W. Lafayette Rd <br />SUBDIVISION <br />Public Info. Meeting <br />(#545) Cont. <br />Hammerel moved to table the application subject to <br />the applicant submitting a preliminary plan designating <br />the following: <br />1.Designate existing structure and setback from <br />lot lines for both lots. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Access easements - note width of each driveway. <br />A proposed house site (house to be of comparable <br />size of others in neighborhood) showing setbacks <br />from lot lines. <br />■ V I ■ VrV •' V f <br />4. Area of each lot and of each driveway. <br />Motion seconded by Jabbour. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />Dr. & Mrs. Seifert, Roger Freeberg (applicant's <br />.architect), and Curtis Pearson (applicant's <br />attorney) were present. Also in attendance <br />were Woody Taylor, 1880 Shadywood Road, and <br />Ewald Gustafson, 1890 Shadywood Road. <br />Mabusth reviewed the application and the <br />condition agreed upon by commission members <br />at their last meeting that the lakeshore cabin <br />would have to be removed before they could <br />recommend approval of the hardcover variance. <br />Mr. Pearson represented the applicant and <br />reviewed the Seifert's position briefly summarized <br />as follows; <br />MILTON SEIFERT <br />1856 Shadywood Road <br />VARIANCE <br />(#548) <br />1. Proposed project will improve the existing <br />hardcover condition - reduction from 41% to 32%, <br />;; <br />2.Proposed project will improve aesthetics <br />question of the property and as a result <br />benefit the neighborhood.