Laserfiche WebLink
he developer was xnto because o <br />ave a major °"ess safety. <br />os regarding pla Hennepin <br />vhe situation <br />1484 Shoreline o <br />nuedi <br />^7 <br />I <br />: <br />ounty staff and . ^g^d dedicati Hennepin <br />pl.t "U such . ^ two law. <br />ot 6» to sugqested plan ?“ ested an■ounty has provided a lat sugg <br />is mpH realignment. i^wdiate setback- <br />,utlot rather t^^ only a ^ux „ ^oalignment. <br />jrnr«ltS no l«>a <br />_ S • <br />\ <br />/ <br />Lnc wx«-“ — <br />vt.fi three concerns. <br />our planner <br />__ a.« vhis pla <br />safety of t? ^^®*?Vplat toad*”*’^ <br />Icross ?he stref (U^^cUUy «ef <br />t«ns) tU'^racketts Point Roa <br />’ rrtUtrrias^had n„n^/ -iSC-r <br />eluding 10 1979 figures ware not <br />■t^^l^diri-y Hernepln county.) <br />* . . • ■.* 9 0 C <br />I <br />.^vid;i by Hennepin ^ <br />coition was originally <br />our approved (for ^"®g®®be”improved for <br />,lat not be .P^ iggs the acces _x.atistics, and <br />,f dwellings) of n^^-s'^ it Is apparent <br />‘t!!?U,a«l site inspections, io«“°" ‘°"a <br />ritt'worirSe'^onsidered^ad^^^^^^^^^ <br />hinge in did not even *^^||son toSHu--,r.rs-u -.4....». - <br />access changes. ^ a-.ve r <br />i <br />hat the and ^iU If ®^^pie living •iccidenjts m /hazards for the p F connover <br />n the Drive called me earlie^ stated <br />,£ 1,89 Shorelin^^^^^^ Sitfpit'sible to <br />irrairhten “the «ad »d^th« s^ ^„hlen,s. <br />to Hennepin County <br />(Continued) <br />n d